06.06.2013 Views

Beyond Feelings

Beyond Feelings

Beyond Feelings

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

CHAPTER 6 What Is Evidence?<br />

respects. Here is an actual example of an issue that has been badly confused<br />

by the use of irrelevant evidence. For years, many college administrators<br />

rejected instructors’ requests for a reduction in class size for<br />

courses such as writing, speaking, and critical thinking. The administrators<br />

cited scholarly studies demonstrating that teaching effectiveness is<br />

unrelated to class size—in other words, that teachers can be as effective<br />

with fifty students in the classroom as they are with fifteen. Yet the scholarly<br />

studies in question examined only courses that impart information,<br />

not those that develop skills. For the latter, the very courses in question,<br />

the evidence had no relevance.<br />

Evaluating Evidence<br />

We all like to think of ourselves as totally objective, equally open to either<br />

side of every issue. But that is rarely the case. Even if we have not yet<br />

taken a firm position on an issue at the outset of our evaluation, we will<br />

usually be tilted in one direction or the other by our overall philosophy of<br />

life, our political or social views, our opinions on related issues, or our attitude<br />

toward the people associated with the various views. This tilting,<br />

also known as bias, may be so slight that it has little or no effect on our<br />

judgment. On the other hand, it may be significant enough to short-circuit<br />

critical thinking. The more we tilt on an issue, the greater our thinking<br />

deficit is likely to be.<br />

How can you tell when bias is hindering your evaluation of evidence?<br />

Look for one or more of these signs:<br />

• You approach your evaluation wanting one side to be proved right.<br />

• You begin your investigation assuming that familiar views will<br />

prove correct.<br />

• You look for evidence that supports the side of the issue you favor<br />

and ignore evidence that opposes it.<br />

• You rate sources by how favorable they are to your thinking rather<br />

than by their reliability and the quality of their research.<br />

• You are nitpickingly critical of evidence for views you oppose and<br />

uncritical of evidence for views you favor.<br />

• When you encounter evidence that opposes your bias, you begin<br />

arguing against it, often before you have completed examining it.<br />

Although you may not be able to eliminate your biases, you can<br />

nevertheless identify and control them, and that is all that is necessary.<br />

The purpose of evaluating evidence is to discover the truth, regardless<br />

of whether it is pleasant or unpleasant, and the only way to do so is to<br />

evaluate fairly. Such an evaluation will sometimes require you to conclude<br />

that the view you leaned toward (or actually held) is mistaken.<br />

79

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!