Arbeit macht frei: - Fredrick Töben

At page 1159 is a reference to myself. Unfortunately, I’m not as
handsome as the man in the picture – I don’t know where he got that
from. And then we have an invitation to vote on the web as to whether Dr
Toben can get justice from Jewish judges when he comes before the court
and you can just press a button and see how the voting goes. A Jewish –
you can either vote ‘Yes’ – a Jewish judge cannot be questioned, or ‘No’ –
the Jewish control of the judicial system is appalling. That’s the kind of
material that his Honour had before him and it makes no difference in
relation to ground 9 that Dr Toben may not have been the creative genius
behind this – he certainly, as editor, decided to publish it. And there’s
much more – which I won’t take your Honours’ time with – of the same
kind.
Home detention – I’ve just checked the transcript with the assistance of
my instructing solicitor during the break. The question of possible home
detention was raised by my learned friend before Lander J on 28 April
and it was raised again on – and at that time he knew that he was thinking
– and then on 13 May – the day when the decision was to be handed
down, he again asked for home detention, but he was completely unable
to assist the primary judge with any information as to statutory power or
what the regime was in South Australia or the like and, in our submission,
even if he had been able to assist and put a constructive alternative
proposal, the learned primary judge made it clear that he regarded
imprisonment – custodial imprisonment – as the appropriate sentence.
So, in our submission, there’s no error shown in the exercise of the
sentencing discretion. May it please the court.
* * * * *
Of course, Lander did not make the logical conclusion that the actual Court
Orders lock up the topic Holocaust, or at least make it a legal minefield to
venture into. But for him there is no need to discuss the Holocaust because
it happened. Likewise with Gilmore and Graham.
In December 2006 the Iranian president had asked a simple question: ‘Is
the Holocaust not an historical event?’. The answer is obvious: ‘Yes’.
Next question: ‘Then, like any other historical event, why not investigate
it?’. Answer: ‘Hater – Holocaust denier – anti-Semite – racist – Nazi’. End
of civilised dialogue.
These three judges, together with Lander, Branson, et al, are devout
Holocaust believers, and Dr Mahmoud Ahmadinejad’s wisdom has no
home within their minds, and neither within their worldview.
122