19.06.2013 Views

Arbeit macht frei: - Fredrick Töben

Arbeit macht frei: - Fredrick Töben

Arbeit macht frei: - Fredrick Töben

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

HIS HONOUR: Can you tell me one last thing? Why is that Dr <strong>Töben</strong><br />

hasn’t sought either leave to appeal or appeal from my declaration since<br />

the penalty hearing?<br />

MR PERKINS: The reason – I’m sorry, your Honour said ‘since the<br />

penalty hearing’?<br />

HIS HONOUR: Since the penalty hearing. It would not have meant that<br />

the appeal would have been heard before the penalty was imposed, but<br />

why hasn’t he appealed?<br />

MR PERKINS: Your Honour, the reason that he hasn’t is that I was of<br />

the view that it was not appropriate that an appeal breaking up the trial be<br />

commenced.<br />

HIS HONOUR: Well, no, that wouldn’t have broken up the trial<br />

MR PERKINS: I’m – it’s possible that I was quite wrong.<br />

HIS HONOUR: it would certainly have been the appeal and I would<br />

have gone ahead and imposed the sentence.<br />

MR PERKINS: I beg your Honour’s pardon?<br />

HIS HONOUR: That wouldn’t have broken up the trial. There was no<br />

reason why your client couldn’t have appealed but allowed the penalty to<br />

have been imposed.<br />

MR PERKINS: Your Honour has mentioned what the position in South<br />

Australia is<br />

HIS HONOUR: I’m not talking about that; I’m on a different point, if<br />

you’d please follow. You said that your client has an appeal because you<br />

took the view that you ought not to break up the trial process; I’m asking<br />

why didn’t you appeal – why didn’t you lodge a notice of appeal or lodge<br />

your application for appeal after the penalty hearing which would not<br />

have, in any way, impeded me from imposing the penalty which was<br />

imposed today, and you would have been within time.<br />

MR PERKINS: Your Honour, that, in my view and it may have been a<br />

wrong view, but in my view, that would have been inappropriate in the<br />

sense that it broke up the process<br />

HIS HONOUR: Well, I’m saying to you it wouldn’t have. It would have<br />

had no impact upon me. It wouldn’t have stopped me imposing the<br />

penalty this morning, but your client would have been within time if he<br />

had a right of appeal. Why did he not exercise his rights?<br />

MR PERKINS: Your Honour, I’ve explained it in the only way that I can,<br />

and that is<br />

HIS HONOUR: All right. Thank you. That’s the best you can<br />

MR PERKINS: It was because of a view that I took, and that view may<br />

well have been incorrect, but that is the reason that it wasn’t done.<br />

HIS HONOUR: Thank you, yes.<br />

130

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!