Arbeit macht frei: - Fredrick Töben

of those exterminated [including all ‘undesirables’, within the variouslycoloured,
triangle Nazi categories – such as Poles, Soviet civilians and
PoWs, the disabled, petty criminals, homosexuals, Jehovah’s Witnesses,
and regime opponents], is estimated by the same source as having been
somewhere between 11 million and 17 million persons.
Yet we do, and as time elapses we are increasingly left to infer, from
accounts of ‘regurgitating, potting Historiology’, that the then-murdered Jews
were the only victims worthy of endorsement in the historical records.
So, it is clear that insistence upon remembrance from biased, Zionist, media
magnates might well be, itself, a ‘racist’ strategy: and it seems, to many
analytical critics, that Zionist brainwashing about ‘The Holocaust’ is
exclusively to shield themselves against any adverse criticism of their
misconduct.
Like Maurice Horsburgh, I believe in encouraging the majority of the Jewish
people in their resistance to the excesses of Zionist extremism.
Such excesses are leading to close mimicry of the economo-political
circumstances that provoked Hitler’s policies as he initially outlined them in
‘Mein Kampf’ - which, unfortunately, is a ‘banned’ Historical document.
Meanwhile, judging from recent events in the Gaza-Strip-Ghetto alone, the
way in which ‘The Holocaust’ is being remembered is neither preventing
further holocausts, and nor is it curbing anti-Semitism; for, after-all, the
Palestinians are themselves Semites.
From that might we therefore often justifiably describe Israel as an ‘anti-
Semitic’ nation?
Raymond Groves
*
Jail for holocaust denial or contempt of court ?
The Southeast Asian Times, Saturday 22 August 2009
The letter from Maurice Horsburgh, Queensland ‘ Hypocrisy is alive
and well ‘Down Under’ in The Southeast Asian Times, 20 August surely
reveals a nihilistic element within the political administration of the
Australian judicial system? Daniel Lewis, the (very) regular contributor
to The Australian newspaper, attempts to refute the argument that Dr
Fredrick Toben was not imprisoned on a guilty charge of ‘holocaust
denial’ but for ‘contempt of court’.
Now, maintaining consistency is vital in every rational debate so, as Mr
Lewis’s credibility disappears down another aberrant Zionist abyss he
may care, in passing, to glance at The Jewish News report 13 August
2009 which states viz ‘Toben jailed for holocaust denial’.
229