Arbeit macht frei: - Fredrick Töben

MR MARGO: You didn’t say, Dr Toben, Zionist control country
Australia, but excluding the judiciary of Australia, did you?
Dr Töben: I did not. I would add it now. Now, you have …
MR MARGO: And you admitted …?
Dr Töben: Sorry, if I may say - you have now, this is – I’m illustrating to
his Honour – your Honour, this is – and I’m illustrating – and I’ve had
this with my associates as well – I would say something, I would put
something up and somebody would say, ‘Hey, look, wait a minute, you’re
saying the Zionists do this, please modify it. Please control – add
something to it,’ we’ve done that again and again. We’ve deleted material.
This is how I operate. I don’t know everything, but I’ll run with headlines
like in The Advertiser or in The Australian, they run with headlines and
then they apologise. I’ve done that. I cannot control all these things.
MR MARGO: Thank you. In conclusion, Dr Toben – I think it will be
conclusion – I put it to you that when you said on this page – sorry, there
will be one further question. When you said on this page that you’re
waiting to see what the judge will do, and you’ve admitted in evidence
given this morning, that if the judge simply says, ‘Obey the law,’ he’ll be
falling in with the Zionists and Talmudists, that it’s an open question for
you, as you sit there, whether or not the judge before whom you appear is
controlled by the Zionists. And the outcome will depend on whether or
not he honours your action, or grants you an indulgence, or what decision
is made by him?
Dr Töben: I reject your premise, Mr Perkins (sic –Margo) It’s false. It’s
not enough, it’s too limiting. You are reducing me to something that I’m
not which is the history of these proceedings.
MR MARGO: Dr Toben, I said finally, but there’s one more question.
You said in your affidavit this morning that after the judgment was given
you took everything down. Was that on the same day the judgment was
given?
Dr Töben: Midnight. On midnight. I couldn’t …
MR MARGO: Can you explain then why in the evidence, in exhibit JJ1,
there are documents still on the website dated 17 April and 20 April, for
example?
Dr Töben: That had nothing to do with the website. The website’s gone
and it had nothing to do with the historical investigations. These were
public commentaries, like this one here. Am I not allowed to do that? I
was not aware that I wasn’t allowed to operate a website and publish. I did
not understand the orders to mean nothing.
MR MARGO: I just – I put it to you and please ask to see the exhibit if
you need to, but at page 11 – 199, on exhibit JJ1, there is a document
which was printed on 17 April which is headed What Kind of Truth Is It
– it’s headed Adelaide Institute, and then it reads: What kind of truth is it
77