Arbeit macht frei: - Fredrick Töben

While working briefly for ABC-Radio at the Horsham office in 1989 I
explained to those interested, such as Mark Skurnik, that my enemy is the
person who wishes to keep information from me, then pretends this act of
blatant censorship is for the wellbeing of society.
One such misguided person in Germany is a state prosecutor, Andreas
Grossmann, who delighted in proceeding against Sylvia Stolz, Horst
Mahler, Germar Rudolf and Ernst Zündel, then, for example, gloated
during my London imprisonment that he would have me at Mannheim in
early 2009. Now the push is to have me in Mannheim in May 2010.
There is no obvious awareness of how important free expression is to a
society’s well being and where truth telling is a fundamental moral virtue.
And so it comes to pass that in the course of defending the most precious
thing we have as humans – our freedom to think and to speak, of course in
a civilized way – I do my time.
The matter that Jones raises we reduce to a formula that highlights a moral
problem:
Do I tell the truth or do I obey the law?
On Adelaide Institute’s website we claimed that Jones would go for the law
at the expense of truth-telling, while we stated that we would do both. In the
former the Marxist/Talmudic dialectic operates where the end-result is a
win-lose situation, while we use the Hegelian dialectic where it is a win-win
because the opposites merge in a new synthesis
Jones, of course has no moral perspective because he bids all slavishly to
follow the law, the Torah and Talmud, without exception, and just through
sophistry talk your way out of any situation.
However, we have always claimed that in our business talk is cheap, and so
is anything that comes from Jones – whenever he attempts to defend his
legal action against Adelaide Institute that aims to censor historical debate –
is mere puffery.
This matter is raised again in court before Justice Lander as revealed in the
court transcripts that follow.
17