Arbeit macht frei: - Fredrick Töben

of a universal value system, which indicates their moral and intellectual
bankruptcy.
31. My travelling to Germany in 1999 there to speak with a public
prosecutor, as I had done in 1997, aimed to clarify how German law
initially used defamation law to silence individuals who question the
Holocaust narrative. The first serious shot was fired in Germany in 1983
when the University of Göttingen withdrew the doctorate it conferred on
Judge Wilhelm Stäglich. Why? During the war he spent time at Auschwitz
concentration camp, and then wrote about it, The Auschwitz Myth,
published in 1979 (need to check…date) The university considered the
book did not meet academic standards and thus Stäglich was not worthy
of retaining his doctorate. It was during the 1990s that Germany
specifically enacted Holocaust denial legislation in its Section 130 of the
Criminal Code, which forbids the defamation of the dead! Usually in
defamation action the death of a person stops any kind of legal action, not
so in Germany where the matter is handled by the Public Prosecutor and
treated as a victimless crime. To date I still have not been convicted by the
German courts because the matter is set for a re-trial in May 2010, but
Lewis/Wertheim do not care much for the truth, otherwise they would be
ashamed of plugging their pet lies of the Holocaust.
32. The use of the shut-up term ‘race-hatred’ and ‘Holocaust denial’ is
used to suppress dissenting opinions from emerging in this politically
correct western democratic world. It has nothing to do with the rehabilitating
National Socialism, though obviously since October 2008 the
parallels of banks crashing with that of the 1930s and the rise of National
Socialism, cannot be denied. The fact that last year the US government
bailed out banks invites historical comparison. But how can anyone
‘whitewash the Nazi crimes’, when we are not even permitted, for fear of
legal persecution, from looking into them and evaluating them?
33. #16: Had I not left early, three weeks before the Teheran Holocaust
Conference began, then the legal action against me, set down in Sydney
for 5 December 2006, would have prevented my attending the
conference. I escaped the legal clutches of this Jewish-inspired witch-hunt
just in time – and they will never forgive me for making it to Teheran, and
with a model of Treblinka concentration camp that illustrated how this
particular narrative is a myth.
34. The fact that the Iranian President, Dr Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, is to
date the only world statesman who has asked that the Holocaust narrative
be reviewed – not revised – speaks volumes on the demise of our ideal of
democracy in action. The Iranians cannot understand how democratic
Germany, for example, and now Australia, imprisons individuals who dare
question the veracity of the Holocaust-Shoah narrative. For them it
194