19.06.2013 Views

Arbeit macht frei: - Fredrick Töben

Arbeit macht frei: - Fredrick Töben

Arbeit macht frei: - Fredrick Töben

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

I wish to bring to your attention some points, which are relevant to the<br />

above:<br />

1. That the Australian Jewish community were among the most<br />

important backers of the racial vilification bill, when it was introduced<br />

(see attached article - Racial vilification bill: the real agenda, News<br />

Weekly, July 2, 1994)<br />

2. That prior to the introduction of the bill, concerns were voiced that it<br />

would be used to prevent anyone from the free expression of ideas. It<br />

was predicted that ‘It is equally possible, indeed likely, that once a racial<br />

hatred law is on the Federal statute book it will be misused at the behest<br />

of some lobby group which has successfully stacked a few branches of<br />

the Labor Party and wants to silence views which it finds offensive, even<br />

if they are expressed moderately and in the course of ordinary debate.<br />

(see attached article Lying by legislation , The Australian, 12 November<br />

1994 (The same inference of course applies also to the Liberal Party)<br />

3. With reference to the above; ‘remarkably, the Liberals’ Deputy<br />

Leader Peter Costello who was also in attendance at the conference<br />

refrained from distancing his party from Mr. Keatings’s bill.’ (ie they<br />

also supported the bill)<br />

4. That the Act has, in fact, been used by a very small, but influential<br />

lobby group, namely the ECAJ. (Australian Jews represent<br />

approximately 0.5 % of the population)<br />

5. That no other religious group has influence of the same order as this<br />

group.<br />

6. That the ECAJ are the main beneficiaries and end-users of this<br />

legislation. (see attached - ECAJ Cases under the Racial Hatred Act.<br />

7. That the ECAJ has persecuted a Christian Group, an elderly widow,<br />

and of course the intellectual, Dr Toben, all for having views which do<br />

not coincide with their own, under the guise of racial hatred.<br />

8. That the courts have a standard formulated order that was used in all<br />

of the above-mentioned cases involving ‘Holocaust Denial’, and, that<br />

includes the following: ‘The respondent be restrained from publishing<br />

or republishing to the public by himself or any agent or employee and<br />

whether on the World Wide Web or otherwise:<br />

9. (iii) any other material which conveys the following imputations or any<br />

of them:<br />

10. there is serious doubt that the Holocaust occurred;<br />

11. it is unlikely that there were homicidal gas chambers at Auschwitz;<br />

12. Jewish people who are offended by and challenge Holocaust denial<br />

are of limited intelligence; and<br />

13. some Jewish people, for improper purposes, including financial gain,<br />

exaggerated the number of Jews killed during World War II and the<br />

circumstances in which they were killed.’<br />

202

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!