District Institutes of Education and Training - Teacher Education
District Institutes of Education and Training - Teacher Education
District Institutes of Education and Training - Teacher Education
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>District</strong> <strong>Institutes</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Education</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Training</strong>: A Comparative Study in Three Indian States<br />
were not structured to elicit formative feedback, since they tended to be closed<br />
questions (e.g. were you satisfied with this training, yes or no?).<br />
5.2.4 Development <strong>of</strong> ‘outreach’ trainers<br />
While some training programmes are done directly in DIETs by DIET staff, others<br />
are delivered at block level by Master Trainers who have taken training from the<br />
DIET. Since design <strong>of</strong> a programme does not take place at the DIET level, each<br />
programme involves at least some level <strong>of</strong> cascade training, where DIET staff<br />
attend training at the top <strong>of</strong> the cascade (the State level) to learn about the<br />
package, <strong>and</strong> return to their institute to deliver it directly, or train others (Master<br />
Trainers <strong>and</strong> Resource Persons) to pass it to teachers. Normally, the head <strong>of</strong> the<br />
relevant DIET branch to the training attends the apex level training. The issue <strong>of</strong><br />
the DIET staff ’s competencies in their particular branch was discussed in chapter<br />
3; so where there was weakness in this respect, that weakness would be present at<br />
the top level <strong>of</strong> the training cascade.<br />
In the two DPEP <strong>District</strong>s, the DIET used some Block <strong>and</strong> Cluster Resource<br />
Centre staff as resource people, but the DPEP was responsible for the development<br />
<strong>of</strong> their capacities, <strong>and</strong> those staff had their primary allegiance to the body that set<br />
them up – DPEP – rather than the DIET.<br />
In Masuda, Indore <strong>and</strong> Surat DIETs, Master Trainers were regular visitors to the<br />
DIET, <strong>and</strong> all <strong>of</strong> these DIETs worked hard to develop them; there was less<br />
proaction about this in Udaipur DIET. Criteria for selection <strong>of</strong> Master Trainers<br />
varied across the DIETs: for Indore <strong>and</strong> Surat DIETs, since the Master Trainer role<br />
was additional to regular teaching duties, criteria were not fixed, but an important<br />
one was willingness. In Indore DIET, for example, a staff member who was very<br />
concerned to develop the Master Trainers said ‘Criteria … enthusiastic persons,<br />
who are active, who are self-willed, who are developed in their work, this is one<br />
criterion… <strong>and</strong> those who can do activities without any hesitation… <strong>and</strong> then,<br />
their own personal problems should not get in the way <strong>of</strong> their work’.<br />
The Surat DIET Principal had personally visited Cluster Resource Centres as they<br />
were set up <strong>and</strong> encouraged the new leaders, aware <strong>of</strong> the transition they were<br />
making:<br />
In the beginning… when classes were going on for 7 days I visited all blocks a<br />
minimum <strong>of</strong> twice during the training. There were around 32 classes. During<br />
my second visit I used to tell them if you still have any problem let me know<br />
<strong>and</strong> I will come a third time. Let me know if you need anything, if there is any<br />
work, any other problem, I will be coming tomorrow or the day after so if there<br />
is any thing which needs to be brought I will do it. They were never made to<br />
98 DFID