District Institutes of Education and Training - Teacher Education
District Institutes of Education and Training - Teacher Education
District Institutes of Education and Training - Teacher Education
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>District</strong> <strong>Institutes</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Education</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Training</strong>: A Comparative Study in Three Indian States<br />
work this way, or shown how to work in teacher training college, how to work<br />
with teachers.. they went to a school for 2 hours inspection, prepared files <strong>and</strong><br />
came back. That’s why in the beginning I adopted this type <strong>of</strong> strategy<br />
(GUJ/SUR/P 18.1.01).<br />
Lok Jumbish had put much effort into developing Master Trainers though joint<br />
meetings between DIET staff, Lok Jumbish representatives, <strong>and</strong> teachers. For this,<br />
a point system was developed (Box 5.2):<br />
We felt that it was really necessary to find out in a person which 4-5 good<br />
characteristics are there, which weaknesses there are, so that in the coming 2-3<br />
years we can minimise those weaknesses. So the person on whom we are<br />
spending so much money becomes useful. For that we decided 8-10 points.<br />
They also said that people who are weak should be dropped. If we can’t find<br />
out a weak person <strong>and</strong> we send him to give some training at a particular place,<br />
he won’t be able to do it <strong>and</strong> our programme will fail. How to recognise a weak<br />
person? We developed points like someone who observes time, expression,<br />
delivery… If they have important things like that, they will be fine. If a person<br />
has more than half the weaknesses he is not useful to us. That’s what we decided<br />
after the rating. We also asked teachers who will take the training what type <strong>of</strong><br />
person they wanted. They said someone who takes us along with him. So the<br />
point <strong>of</strong> participation was raised, who can make us underst<strong>and</strong> properly - means<br />
a person should have a grasp <strong>of</strong> the subject – a subject expert. All this came from<br />
them, what we should see in our MT, so it becomes successful<br />
(RAJ/MAS/TT07 19.7.1999).<br />
Box 5.2: 10 desirable points for a Master Trainer, Masuda DIET<br />
1. Participatory approach<br />
2. Punctuality<br />
3. Capacity to take initiative<br />
4. Knowledge <strong>of</strong> content<br />
5. Knowledge <strong>of</strong> skills<br />
6. Presentation <strong>of</strong> chapter<br />
7. Expression, oral<br />
8. Expression, written<br />
9. Retention in sessions<br />
10. Attitude/outlook<br />
It is interesting, however, that this trainer interprets what teachers are saying as a<br />
need for content expertise. An alternative interpretation might be that teachers are<br />
requesting trainers who are competent in the pedagogy <strong>of</strong> training, <strong>and</strong> able to<br />
relate training messages to teachers’ underst<strong>and</strong>ings <strong>and</strong> aspirations.<br />
DFID 99