28.06.2013 Views

District Institutes of Education and Training - Teacher Education

District Institutes of Education and Training - Teacher Education

District Institutes of Education and Training - Teacher Education

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>District</strong> <strong>Institutes</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Education</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Training</strong>: A Comparative Study in Three Indian States<br />

work this way, or shown how to work in teacher training college, how to work<br />

with teachers.. they went to a school for 2 hours inspection, prepared files <strong>and</strong><br />

came back. That’s why in the beginning I adopted this type <strong>of</strong> strategy<br />

(GUJ/SUR/P 18.1.01).<br />

Lok Jumbish had put much effort into developing Master Trainers though joint<br />

meetings between DIET staff, Lok Jumbish representatives, <strong>and</strong> teachers. For this,<br />

a point system was developed (Box 5.2):<br />

We felt that it was really necessary to find out in a person which 4-5 good<br />

characteristics are there, which weaknesses there are, so that in the coming 2-3<br />

years we can minimise those weaknesses. So the person on whom we are<br />

spending so much money becomes useful. For that we decided 8-10 points.<br />

They also said that people who are weak should be dropped. If we can’t find<br />

out a weak person <strong>and</strong> we send him to give some training at a particular place,<br />

he won’t be able to do it <strong>and</strong> our programme will fail. How to recognise a weak<br />

person? We developed points like someone who observes time, expression,<br />

delivery… If they have important things like that, they will be fine. If a person<br />

has more than half the weaknesses he is not useful to us. That’s what we decided<br />

after the rating. We also asked teachers who will take the training what type <strong>of</strong><br />

person they wanted. They said someone who takes us along with him. So the<br />

point <strong>of</strong> participation was raised, who can make us underst<strong>and</strong> properly - means<br />

a person should have a grasp <strong>of</strong> the subject – a subject expert. All this came from<br />

them, what we should see in our MT, so it becomes successful<br />

(RAJ/MAS/TT07 19.7.1999).<br />

Box 5.2: 10 desirable points for a Master Trainer, Masuda DIET<br />

1. Participatory approach<br />

2. Punctuality<br />

3. Capacity to take initiative<br />

4. Knowledge <strong>of</strong> content<br />

5. Knowledge <strong>of</strong> skills<br />

6. Presentation <strong>of</strong> chapter<br />

7. Expression, oral<br />

8. Expression, written<br />

9. Retention in sessions<br />

10. Attitude/outlook<br />

It is interesting, however, that this trainer interprets what teachers are saying as a<br />

need for content expertise. An alternative interpretation might be that teachers are<br />

requesting trainers who are competent in the pedagogy <strong>of</strong> training, <strong>and</strong> able to<br />

relate training messages to teachers’ underst<strong>and</strong>ings <strong>and</strong> aspirations.<br />

DFID 99

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!