District Institutes of Education and Training - Teacher Education
District Institutes of Education and Training - Teacher Education
District Institutes of Education and Training - Teacher Education
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>District</strong> <strong>Institutes</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Education</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Training</strong>: A Comparative Study in Three Indian States<br />
Figure 0.1: Situation analysis framework<br />
Pr<strong>of</strong>essional<br />
inputs<br />
Human<br />
Financial<br />
NGOs<br />
DDO<br />
Internal<br />
Systemic Leadership<br />
DPEO<br />
CRC<br />
Resource<br />
dependency<br />
Management<br />
0.4 Site selection<br />
BRC<br />
Human<br />
Financial<br />
Policy<br />
documents<br />
Linkages<br />
outside<br />
DIET<br />
Resources<br />
within DIET<br />
Physical<br />
Values<br />
Calendar<br />
Activities<br />
PRESET,<br />
INSET, other<br />
branches<br />
DIET<br />
SITUATION<br />
ANALYSIS<br />
Institutional<br />
staffing<br />
Teamwork<br />
Co-operation<br />
Assumptions Underst<strong>and</strong>ings<br />
Action with<br />
teachers,<br />
schools<br />
Planning Expertise<br />
Impact <strong>and</strong><br />
relevance for<br />
clients<br />
<strong>Teacher</strong>s<br />
Students<br />
Schools<br />
Village<br />
communities<br />
Cluster/<br />
Block<br />
Resource<br />
Centres<br />
Other<br />
institutions<br />
Policy<br />
inputs<br />
Capacity<br />
building<br />
Two DIETs each were selected from the States <strong>of</strong> Gujarat, Madhya Pradesh <strong>and</strong><br />
Rajasthan, to gain a range <strong>of</strong> social <strong>and</strong> governmental contexts. An added<br />
dimension was the inclusion in each State <strong>of</strong> one DIET from a <strong>District</strong> where an<br />
external intervention was running (the <strong>District</strong> Primary <strong>Education</strong> Programme in<br />
Gujarat <strong>and</strong> Madhya Pradesh, see box 0.1) <strong>and</strong> the Lok Jumbish project in<br />
Rajasthan (see box 0.2). The other DIET in the State was internally resourced – a<br />
regular ‘government DIET’.<br />
Sample DIETs were selected in consultation with each apex State body.<br />
No preference for a particular DIET was shown, although in Rajasthan, the<br />
then Chairman <strong>of</strong> Lok Jumbish encouraged the team to work with Masuda<br />
DIET (Ajmer <strong>District</strong>), which he considered the best developed <strong>of</strong> the three<br />
DIETs adopted by Lok Jumbish. Otherwise, it was acknowledged that the vast<br />
majority <strong>of</strong> DIETs were not meeting expectations, <strong>and</strong> the project was expected to<br />
shed light on reasons for this. State-level <strong>of</strong>ficials in all three States were supportive<br />
<strong>and</strong> available for discussion <strong>and</strong> feedback throughout. For DIETs participating in<br />
the project, this would be a first experience <strong>of</strong> a process-orientated research<br />
approach, <strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong> a project that intended to provide developmental support<br />
according to their priorities. There was openness towards these ideas <strong>and</strong><br />
widespread agreement <strong>of</strong> the need for support, although in practice the extent to<br />
DFID 5