28.06.2013 Views

District Institutes of Education and Training - Teacher Education

District Institutes of Education and Training - Teacher Education

District Institutes of Education and Training - Teacher Education

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>District</strong> <strong>Institutes</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Education</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Training</strong>: A Comparative Study in Three Indian States<br />

Progress towards adoption <strong>of</strong> the second model paves the way for further refinement<br />

<strong>of</strong> the focus <strong>of</strong> teacher development activities across the system. This study has<br />

provided evidence that the key to this may lie in a change <strong>of</strong> emphasis. At present,<br />

DIETs are pursuing a model <strong>of</strong> input-led programmes for improving the skills <strong>and</strong><br />

knowledge <strong>of</strong> teachers. <strong>Teacher</strong>s – both pre- <strong>and</strong> in-service – tend to have a weak<br />

belief in the efficacy <strong>of</strong> such training <strong>and</strong> take-up <strong>of</strong> training messages is low. This<br />

training isolates individual teachers from school contexts, does not acknowledge<br />

their value frameworks <strong>and</strong> practitioner underst<strong>and</strong>ings, <strong>and</strong> holds them responsible<br />

for not ‘implementing training’. This model struggles further to find relevance in a<br />

decentralising context because it is unable to engage teachers in developing a sense<br />

<strong>of</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>essional agency <strong>and</strong> accountability towards the learning <strong>of</strong> all children.<br />

10.3.5 Nurturing pr<strong>of</strong>essional accountability<br />

The findings <strong>of</strong> this study indicate the need for exploration <strong>of</strong> the relative merits <strong>of</strong><br />

rooting teacher development through DIETs <strong>and</strong> their associated Resource Centres<br />

in a school improvement approach, rather than in teacher improvement as it is at<br />

present. This would provide a meaningful focus for teacher development as one <strong>of</strong><br />

many activities converging at the school around improving the quality <strong>of</strong> children’s<br />

learning (see Fig. 10.5). This study found a focus on children’s learning to be largely<br />

missing in teacher development through DIETs, whether during pre- or in-service<br />

training. The evidence presented here indicates a need for much greater systemic<br />

awareness <strong>of</strong> the need to nurture pr<strong>of</strong>essional accountability for children’s learning.<br />

Figure 10.5: DIET support for Whole School improvement<br />

Childcentred<br />

curriculum<br />

Positive<br />

teacher<br />

attitudes<br />

Enrolment<br />

<strong>of</strong> all eligible<br />

children<br />

Context<br />

sensitive<br />

teacher<br />

education<br />

Reduction<br />

in drop-outs<br />

<strong>and</strong> repeaters<br />

WHOLE SCHOOL<br />

IMPROVEMENT<br />

▲ ▲<br />

Wellsupported<br />

teachers<br />

(by DIETS +<br />

CRCs)<br />

Parent <strong>and</strong><br />

community<br />

involvement<br />

Flexible<br />

teaching<br />

methods<br />

Appropriate<br />

teaching aids<br />

<strong>and</strong> equipment<br />

Source: adapted from Whole School improvement, eenet newsletter no. 7, 2003 [eenet.org.uk]<br />

210 DFID

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!