by requirements for the degree of (Education) - NCRTM
by requirements for the degree of (Education) - NCRTM
by requirements for the degree of (Education) - NCRTM
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Table IV shows that 56% 461) <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> 824 referrals made during this<br />
three year period were males and 44% 363) were females. Most <strong>of</strong> th re-<br />
ferrals were made while <strong>the</strong> people were <strong>of</strong> school age: 39% 324) were<br />
referred at age 17; 85% (702) referrals occurred between <strong>the</strong> .ages <strong>of</strong> 15<br />
and 18 inclusive. Most <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> referrals were made <strong>by</strong> public schools: 71%<br />
($84) over <strong>the</strong> three year period, 78% (33) in 1966-67, 70% (167] in 1967-68<br />
and 40% (40) in 1968-69. These figures are somewhat deceiving since in-<br />
<strong>for</strong>mation on referrals made prior to 1966-67 fiscal year was not available.<br />
A high percentage <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> 413 referred prior to July I, 1966 were probably<br />
school referrals. The same would be true <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> I01 coded $3- in 1966-67<br />
<strong>for</strong> whom no referral in<strong>for</strong>mation is available. Taking this into considera-<br />
tion, <strong>the</strong> overall percentage <strong>of</strong> school referrals made prior to June 30, 1969<br />
(<strong>the</strong> end <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> 1968-69 fiscal year) would probably be closer to 80% than 70%.<br />
This would also tend to raise <strong>the</strong> overall percentage <strong>of</strong> referrals in <strong>the</strong><br />
15 to 18 age range. Age at referral and referral source both indicate<br />
that academic programming <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> EMR includes cooperative arrangements<br />
.between local schools and <strong>the</strong> Division <strong>of</strong> Vocational Rehabilitation.<br />
However, this cooperative arrangement does not necessarily mean <strong>the</strong> exis-<br />
tence in all cases <strong>of</strong> <strong>for</strong>mal occupational adjustment programs <strong>for</strong> which<br />
written .areements are signed <strong>by</strong> <strong>the</strong> schools and DVR. A comparison <strong>of</strong><br />
Appendices B and C will show a wide discrepancy between <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong><br />
school districts