06.08.2013 Views

Projecting Fatalities in Crashes Involving Older Drivers, 2000-2025

Projecting Fatalities in Crashes Involving Older Drivers, 2000-2025

Projecting Fatalities in Crashes Involving Older Drivers, 2000-2025

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Second, VMT as a consumption item is someth<strong>in</strong>g that consumers must produce<br />

themselves with comb<strong>in</strong>ations of their time and purchased <strong>in</strong>puts, not an item like cloth<strong>in</strong>g<br />

that can be purchased and consumed directly. The household production model of demand<br />

handles this aspect of the demand for VMT quite well, specify<strong>in</strong>g that the consumer of VMT<br />

produces that service with a comb<strong>in</strong>ation of time and purchased <strong>in</strong>puts (Becker, 1965, pp.<br />

493-517). In the case of VMT, the purchased <strong>in</strong>puts are the vehicle (or at least the<br />

depreciation on the vehicle), fuel, and <strong>in</strong>surance. Both depreciation and <strong>in</strong>surance have at<br />

least theoretical relationships to VMT. Empirically, depreciation would parallel VMT more<br />

closely than would <strong>in</strong>surance payments, if for no other reason than that people have the<br />

opportunity to understate their mileage to their automobile <strong>in</strong>surance companies. Empirical<br />

observations of both depreciation and <strong>in</strong>surance costs are difficult to come by, as are<br />

observations of the amount of time drivers spend produc<strong>in</strong>g their VMT. The fact that time<br />

is required to produce VMT complicates the empirical <strong>in</strong>terpretation of <strong>in</strong>come <strong>in</strong> a demand<br />

equation of the form “VMT = f(<strong>in</strong>come, prices)” because <strong>in</strong>come also <strong>in</strong>fluences the “price”<br />

of VMT. People who earn higher <strong>in</strong>comes face a higher cost of us<strong>in</strong>g their time driv<strong>in</strong>g than<br />

do people who earn lower <strong>in</strong>comes, so the <strong>in</strong>come variable <strong>in</strong> a regular demand equation<br />

conta<strong>in</strong>s both the ord<strong>in</strong>ary <strong>in</strong>come effect and a price effect. For the elderly, the price effect<br />

of <strong>in</strong>come may be lessened somewhat by virtue of the fact that much of their <strong>in</strong>come will<br />

come from asset sources such as retirement plans and earn<strong>in</strong>gs from various types of<br />

<strong>in</strong>vestments and sav<strong>in</strong>gs. Consequently, their time spent driv<strong>in</strong>g is less likely, across all<br />

elderly <strong>in</strong> any one age group, to come out of marg<strong>in</strong>al work<strong>in</strong>g time. Nonetheless, even with<br />

zero work<strong>in</strong>g time, higher <strong>in</strong>comes will cause people to value their leisure more highly, and<br />

time spent driv<strong>in</strong>g will come out of leisure.<br />

The preferred strategy for estimat<strong>in</strong>g the demand for VMT would be a simultaneous<br />

equations approach jo<strong>in</strong>tly estimat<strong>in</strong>g the supply of VMT (mean<strong>in</strong>g the maximum amount of<br />

VMT possible, given time constra<strong>in</strong>ts) and the demand for it. Data limitations, and possibly<br />

the dim<strong>in</strong>ished price effect of <strong>in</strong>come for the elderly, precluded deriv<strong>in</strong>g useful results from<br />

that approach. Consequently, the regression model with which we implemented our VMT<br />

demand estimation used a specification closer to the ord<strong>in</strong>ary demand equation, although we<br />

GM Project G.6 7 - 4<br />

October <strong>2000</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!