06.08.2013 Views

Projecting Fatalities in Crashes Involving Older Drivers, 2000-2025

Projecting Fatalities in Crashes Involving Older Drivers, 2000-2025

Projecting Fatalities in Crashes Involving Older Drivers, 2000-2025

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

younger. In that case, our VMT projections can be considered as a maximum likely scenario.<br />

However, <strong>in</strong> light of all the changes <strong>in</strong> the past twenty years <strong>in</strong> characteristics of drivers,<br />

employment, technology, and <strong>in</strong>frastructure, we are unable to derive a satisfactory, purely<br />

empirical estimate of how much time the future elderly will devote to driv<strong>in</strong>g. 5 Hence we<br />

suggest that a healthier and wealthier elderly population driv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> safer vehicles on improved<br />

highways and possibly greater distances with urban sprawl might devote as much of their time<br />

to driv<strong>in</strong>g as they did when they were thirty years younger, but probably not more. This<br />

maximum level of VMT allows for expected growth <strong>in</strong> the demand for VMT for specific<br />

age/gender groups while ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g a reasonableness <strong>in</strong> the projections. While this anchors<br />

the maximum likely driv<strong>in</strong>g by the 65-69 age cohort <strong>in</strong> <strong>2025</strong>, the proportional decreases <strong>in</strong><br />

driv<strong>in</strong>g among older cohorts at that date depend strictly on the proportionalities <strong>in</strong> the<br />

5 Model<strong>in</strong>g the demand for VMT with a l<strong>in</strong>ear regression may <strong>in</strong>adequately capture the effects of the time it<br />

takes to travel. A person’s time is, of course, limited to twenty-four hours <strong>in</strong> a day, and people typically<br />

devote blocks of time to particular types of activity: sleep, work, eat<strong>in</strong>g, recreation, and so on. The fact that<br />

driv<strong>in</strong>g takes time puts an upper limit on the amount of VMT that a person would demand, regardless of his<br />

or her <strong>in</strong>come. Model<strong>in</strong>g the demand for and supply of VMT simultaneously, <strong>in</strong> a household production<br />

framework, as we suggested above would be an excellent procedure, could account for the <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g scarcity<br />

value of a person’s driv<strong>in</strong>g time as VMT <strong>in</strong>creased, impos<strong>in</strong>g a cap on VMT naturally, accord<strong>in</strong>g to the<br />

valuation a person puts on his or her time. As the valuation of the time spent driv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>creases as more VMT<br />

is undertaken, the cost of VMT will rise considerably, chok<strong>in</strong>g off the demand for it. It may be possible to<br />

develop some other methods to account for the <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g effective cost of time made available to driv<strong>in</strong>g<br />

which would be less demand<strong>in</strong>g of data. It would not be appropriate to simply reduce the magnitudes of the<br />

<strong>in</strong>come elasticities of demand for VMT estimated <strong>in</strong> our ord<strong>in</strong>ary least squares regressions on the grounds that<br />

the negative effect of <strong>in</strong>come on VMT, act<strong>in</strong>g as the cost of driv<strong>in</strong>g time, is excluded, because our current<br />

specification may be allow<strong>in</strong>g some part of the negative component to enter the currently estimated coefficient.<br />

In the present research, we did not have the data to implement any form of a natural capp<strong>in</strong>g of the<br />

demand for VMT, hence our resort to the arbitrary capp<strong>in</strong>g of VMT for 65-69 year old males at the maximum<br />

VMT of any age group <strong>in</strong> 1995, which happened by circumstance to be 35-39 year olds. Pick<strong>in</strong>g the VMT<br />

of any other particular age group might have been preferable <strong>in</strong> some <strong>in</strong>tuitive sense, but not <strong>in</strong> any<br />

empirically determ<strong>in</strong>able manner; s<strong>in</strong>ce our admittedly arbitrary method of capp<strong>in</strong>g the VMT projection uses<br />

only one arbitrary decision, we consider it preferable to pick<strong>in</strong>g a specific age group’s VMT as a cap without<br />

reason to prefer that group over any other, which would <strong>in</strong>volve at least two arbitrary decisions.<br />

We are aware of one study that has addressed the demand for VMT as a household production<br />

problem, although less than fully satisfactorily. Green<strong>in</strong>g et al. estimated the demand for fuel efficiency <strong>in</strong><br />

vehicles, gasol<strong>in</strong>e, and vehicle mile traveled with the seem<strong>in</strong>gly unrelated regressions technique (a<br />

Generalized Least Squares technique for use <strong>in</strong> equations with correlated error terms but not with endogenous<br />

variables of one equation used as <strong>in</strong>dependent variables <strong>in</strong> another equation). Income appears as an<br />

<strong>in</strong>dependent variable <strong>in</strong> all three of their equations, but it never appears <strong>in</strong> an equation as an <strong>in</strong>dicator of the<br />

cost of time spent driv<strong>in</strong>g. Hence there rema<strong>in</strong>s a specification problem <strong>in</strong> their implementation of the<br />

household production approach to estimat<strong>in</strong>g the demand for VMT.<br />

GM Project G.6 7 - 11<br />

October <strong>2000</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!