13.08.2013 Views

Final Environmental Impact Statement Rio de los Pinos Vegetation ...

Final Environmental Impact Statement Rio de los Pinos Vegetation ...

Final Environmental Impact Statement Rio de los Pinos Vegetation ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Final</strong> <strong>Environmental</strong> <strong>Impact</strong> <strong>Statement</strong> <strong>Rio</strong> <strong>de</strong> <strong>los</strong> <strong>Pinos</strong> <strong>Vegetation</strong> Management Project<br />

None of the areas proposed for management treatment contain documented Sensitive plant<br />

species. There are eight Sensitive plants suspected to occur in the areas proposed for treatment<br />

based on habitat affinity (see Table 3.13-1).<br />

Direct, Indirect, and Cumulative Effects<br />

The analysis below is a summary from a Biological Assessment / Biological Evaluation (BA/BE)<br />

for plants that was prepared specifically for this project and is part of the project administrative<br />

record. None of the Alternatives would be expected to result in significant direct, indirect, or<br />

cumulative effects.<br />

Alternative 1 – No Action<br />

This Alternative proposes no new management actions. There are no current or foreseeable<br />

future actions that would be expected to impact Sensitive plants. Therefore, there would be no<br />

Table 3.13-1. Sensitive plant species suspected in the treatment areas and the effects<br />

<strong>de</strong>termination by Alternative.<br />

Determination<br />

Scientific name<br />

1<br />

Alternative<br />

1 2 and 3<br />

Botrychium furcatum NI MAII<br />

Draba smithii NI MAII<br />

Eriophorum altaicum var. neogaeum NI NI<br />

Eriophorum chamissonis NI NI<br />

Eriophorum gracile NI NI<br />

Machaeranthera coloradoensis NI MAII<br />

Salix arizonica NI NI<br />

Sphagnum angustifolium NI NI<br />

1 NI = No <strong>Impact</strong>;<br />

MAII = May adversely impact individuals, but not likely to result in a <strong>los</strong>s of viability on the<br />

Planning Area, nor cause a trend to fe<strong>de</strong>ral listing or a <strong>los</strong>s of species viability rangewi<strong>de</strong>.<br />

direct, indirect, or cumulative effect anticipated on any Sensitive plant species (Table 3.13-1).<br />

Alternatives 2, 3 and Cumulative Effects<br />

Since all action Alternatives propose some level of timber harvest and minor road work, the<br />

effects are consi<strong>de</strong>red equivalent for this analysis since they affect the same habitat (i.e., there is<br />

no real distinction of effects between Alternatives for this particular Analysis Area). Proposed<br />

actions would not impact any documented Sensitive plant populations. Potential habitat exists<br />

for eight Sensitive plants in the proposed treatment areas. Table 3.13-1 summarizes the effects<br />

<strong>de</strong>termination ma<strong>de</strong>, by Alternative, for these species.<br />

Five species were judged to be at such low risk from the proposed actions that there would be no<br />

direct, indirect, or cumulative effect (Table 3.13-1).<br />

Chapter 3 – Affected Environment & <strong>Environmental</strong> Consequences Page 3-76

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!