13.08.2013 Views

Final Environmental Impact Statement Rio de los Pinos Vegetation ...

Final Environmental Impact Statement Rio de los Pinos Vegetation ...

Final Environmental Impact Statement Rio de los Pinos Vegetation ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Final</strong> <strong>Environmental</strong> <strong>Impact</strong> <strong>Statement</strong> <strong>Rio</strong> <strong>de</strong> <strong>los</strong> <strong>Pinos</strong> <strong>Vegetation</strong> Management Project<br />

Alternative 2<br />

Table 3.3-2. Alternative 2 effects on the Key Issues<br />

Key Issue Indicators Alternative 2 – Full Salvage Harvest<br />

a. Total area treated (acres)<br />

b. Disturbance by watershed<br />

-50501 (6<br />

1. Watershed<br />

Health<br />

th Level)<br />

-5050102 (7 th Level)<br />

-5050101 (7 th 878 acres<br />

12.2%<br />

Level Watershed of Concern)<br />

c. Old roads re-opened (miles)<br />

6.1%<br />

18.0%<br />

3.3 miles<br />

d. Road maintenance (miles)<br />

11.9 miles<br />

e. New temp road construction (miles)<br />

0.2 miles<br />

a. Salvage harvesting (acres)<br />

878 acres<br />

b. Late-successional habitat structural class 17.8%<br />

2. Forest changed (percent)<br />

Condition c. Spruce beetle risk rating (average)<br />

Mo<strong>de</strong>rate<br />

d. Heavy fuels removed from project area<br />

(tons/acre)<br />

25 tons/acre<br />

Key Issue 1. Approximately 878 acres would be salvaged un<strong>de</strong>r this alternative. No new<br />

system road construction would occur, but 0.2 miles of new temporary road construction would<br />

occur, to be c<strong>los</strong>ed following management activities. Approximately 3.3 miles of old road would<br />

be re-opened, also to be c<strong>los</strong>ed following management activities. Segments of system road<br />

reconstruction/spot reconstruction (representing 10.1miles) would occur to meet watershed<br />

restoration opportunities. Project <strong>de</strong>sign criteria would be implemented to limit the amount of<br />

potential structural changes in watershed integrity tied to vegetation type, soil type, moisture<br />

availability, or other ecological characteristics due to timber harvesting and road<br />

construction/reconstruction activity. Erosion and stream sedimentation concerns from existing<br />

road conditions would be repaired.<br />

Key Issue 2.<br />

This alternative would treat the largest area, allowing the most utilization of <strong>de</strong>ad<br />

material, and providing the most opportunity to assist the stands in regenerating by utilizing<br />

artificial regeneration methods. A sizeable change in late-successional habitat structural class<br />

would occur, speeding a process that will occur naturally. The largest amount of heavy fuels<br />

would be removed from the area un<strong>de</strong>r this alternative.<br />

Alternative 3<br />

Table 3.3-3. Alternative 3 effects on the Key Issues<br />

Key Issue Indicators Alternative 3 – Reduced Salvage Harvest<br />

a. Total area treated (acres)<br />

b. Disturbance by watershed<br />

-50501 (6<br />

1. Watershed<br />

Health<br />

th Level)<br />

-5050102 (7 th Level)<br />

-5050101 (7 th 607 acres<br />

12.0%<br />

Level Watershed of Concern)<br />

c. Old roads re-opened (miles)<br />

5.9%<br />

17.4%<br />

2.5 miles<br />

d. Road maintenance (miles)<br />

9.9 miles<br />

e. New temp road construction (miles)<br />

0.0 miles<br />

Chapter 3 – Affected Environment &<strong>Environmental</strong> Consequences Page 3-3

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!