13.08.2013 Views

Final Environmental Impact Statement Rio de los Pinos Vegetation ...

Final Environmental Impact Statement Rio de los Pinos Vegetation ...

Final Environmental Impact Statement Rio de los Pinos Vegetation ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Final</strong> <strong>Environmental</strong> <strong>Impact</strong> <strong>Statement</strong> <strong>Rio</strong> <strong>de</strong> <strong>los</strong> <strong>Pinos</strong> <strong>Vegetation</strong> Management Project<br />

Cumulative Effects:<br />

The accumulation of watershed disturbances from past activities is not a threat to watershed<br />

health. As explained above, un<strong>de</strong>r “Existing Conditions”, on the 6 th level total watershed<br />

disturbance is below concern levels established in the Forest Plan. The small tributary to <strong>Rio</strong> <strong>de</strong><br />

<strong>los</strong> <strong>Pinos</strong> (7 th level) was i<strong>de</strong>ntified in the Forest Plan as a watershed of concern, mainly due to the<br />

amount of roa<strong>de</strong>d area and previous timber harvest. During evaluation of this watershed for the<br />

County Line project stream health was found to be robust. Currently, two timber sales are active<br />

in the <strong>Rio</strong> <strong>de</strong> <strong>los</strong> <strong>Pinos</strong> watershed (Spruce Park and Escarabajo). Other recent sales in the <strong>Rio</strong> <strong>de</strong><br />

<strong>los</strong> <strong>Pinos</strong> watershed inclu<strong>de</strong>d Neff Mountain and a small part of Grouse. These sales were<br />

inclu<strong>de</strong>d in the effects analyses for the two action alternatives.<br />

Cumulative watershed disturbances from timber harvest activities are not expected to cause<br />

serious impacts un<strong>de</strong>r any alternative. Disturbances associated with the action alternatives would<br />

not threaten watershed or stream health as long as Forest Plan standards and gui<strong>de</strong>lines and<br />

project <strong>de</strong>sign critera are followed. Since disturbance levels at the 7 th level are greater than<br />

concern levels and a high percentage of natural basal area <strong>los</strong>s has occurred, additional<br />

monitoring, including a monumented cross section that was established in 2004 and evaluated<br />

again in 2008, will continue.<br />

Irreversible and Irretrievable Commitment of the Resources<br />

Any minor impacts to watershed condition or stream health would heal with time. Successful<br />

implementation of standards, gui<strong>de</strong>lines, and <strong>de</strong>sign criteria should keep aquatic resources<br />

healthy and prevent their irreversible or irretrievable <strong>los</strong>s; <strong>los</strong>ses in structural capacities<br />

downstream would also be prevented.<br />

3.7 Soils<br />

Scope of Analysis<br />

This analysis will focus on the soils that are directly and indirectly affected by the proposed<br />

timber harvest in the <strong>Rio</strong> <strong>de</strong> <strong>los</strong> <strong>Pinos</strong> Analysis Area. Cumulative effects are also analyzed.<br />

The <strong>Rio</strong> Gran<strong>de</strong> National Forest Plan has direction that protects soil productivity. The Forest<br />

Plan standards are consistent with similar standards from the FSH 2509.18 – Soil Management<br />

Handbook, R2 Supplement No. 2509.18-92-1, Effective August 15, 1992 (the R2 Supplement),<br />

and FSH 2509.25 – Watershed Conservation Practices Handbook, 2509.25-96-1, 12/26/96 as<br />

amen<strong>de</strong>d in 2006.<br />

Soils were not i<strong>de</strong>ntified as a Key Issue in this analysis, based primarily on the fact that soils in<br />

the <strong>Rio</strong> <strong>de</strong> <strong>los</strong> <strong>Pinos</strong> area do not have the same <strong>de</strong>gree of risk for landsli<strong>de</strong>s that the County Line<br />

project area had. The following discussions are based on the best available science.<br />

Chapter 3 – Affected Environment & <strong>Environmental</strong> Consequences Page 3-28

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!