13.08.2013 Views

Final Environmental Impact Statement Rio de los Pinos Vegetation ...

Final Environmental Impact Statement Rio de los Pinos Vegetation ...

Final Environmental Impact Statement Rio de los Pinos Vegetation ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Final</strong> <strong>Environmental</strong> <strong>Impact</strong> <strong>Statement</strong> <strong>Rio</strong> <strong>de</strong> <strong>los</strong> <strong>Pinos</strong> <strong>Vegetation</strong> Management Project<br />

forest area occurs, Carlson (2008) noted that recent studies and mo<strong>de</strong>ling show a potential for<br />

greater water yields. The harvest of trees eliminates interception of precipitation and shading<br />

which slow snowmelt. In addition, un<strong>de</strong>rstory can be removed and amount of fine and coarse<br />

woody <strong>de</strong>bris is altered. In addition, compaction in skid trails, landings, and roads can affect<br />

overland flow, routing runoff to streams.<br />

These negative effects of skid trails and roads are mitigated by following Forest Plan standards<br />

and gui<strong>de</strong>lines and <strong>de</strong>sign criteria in the Watershed Conservation Practices Handbook. Carlson<br />

(2008) cited recommendations from recent studies to mitigate hydrologic effects of beetle<br />

mortality and associated logging including:<br />

Construct, inspect and maintain roads to ensure natural surface and shallow subsurface<br />

drainage remains intact<br />

Upgra<strong>de</strong> drainage networks on permanent roads prior to salvage logging as necessary to<br />

accommodate expected increases in peak flows<br />

Minimize harvesting in riparian areas and consi<strong>de</strong>r wi<strong>de</strong>r riparian buffer widths<br />

Retain, where possible, all green vegetation (un<strong>de</strong>rstory and overstory) both insi<strong>de</strong> and<br />

outsi<strong>de</strong> of riparian area.<br />

Plan harvest units at the watershed scale to minimize road <strong>de</strong>nsity<br />

Leave fine and coarse woody slash on-site in openings where possible to provi<strong>de</strong><br />

surface roughness which would <strong>de</strong>lay snowmelt, reduce wind speeds (and thus<br />

sublimation), maintain soil moisture and aid in site regeneration<br />

Several of these measures either are being completed as standard implementation of Forest Plan<br />

standards and gui<strong>de</strong>lines or have been adopted as <strong>de</strong>sign criteria to the <strong>Rio</strong> <strong>de</strong> <strong>los</strong> <strong>Pinos</strong> project.<br />

Due to general watershed concerns, additional project <strong>de</strong>sign criteria have been ad<strong>de</strong>d to ensure<br />

protection of stream courses within the harvest areas, including the 7 th level watershed of<br />

concern. These criteria, discussed in more <strong>de</strong>tail below, are simple but effective measures that<br />

inclu<strong>de</strong> restrictions to where harvest can occur and proven sediment control techniques to<br />

prevent impact to streams from road activities. Monitoring by the <strong>Rio</strong> Gran<strong>de</strong> National Forest<br />

(“Effective Monitoring-<strong>Rio</strong> Gran<strong>de</strong> National Forest”, Dobson, 2005) has <strong>de</strong>monstrated that these<br />

and other standards and <strong>de</strong>sign criteria have proven effective in protecting watershed resources.<br />

A no harvest buffer has been established along all stream channels (including the crenulated<br />

network) for 100 feet on both si<strong>de</strong>s of the channel. No heavy equipment would operate within<br />

the water influence zone (100 ft on each si<strong>de</strong> of a channel) except at <strong>de</strong>signated crossings unless<br />

authorized by the Forest Service where site-specific conditions would minimize stream and<br />

riparian impacts. The actual field <strong>de</strong>lineation of the water influence zone in the <strong>Rio</strong> <strong>de</strong> <strong>los</strong> <strong>Pinos</strong><br />

analysis area was usually wi<strong>de</strong>r than the basic <strong>de</strong>finition noted above as wet seeps and riparian<br />

vegetation areas were inclu<strong>de</strong>d.<br />

Approximately 3.3 miles of existing old roads will require reopening. These roads that have<br />

been c<strong>los</strong>ed for some time have naturally revegetated to varying <strong>de</strong>grees but would need to be<br />

maintained or reconstructed. These roads would be evaluated by Forest Service personnel to<br />

i<strong>de</strong>ntify erosion and sediment concerns so they can be fixed as part of upgrading operations.<br />

Chapter 3 – Affected Environment & <strong>Environmental</strong> Consequences Page 3-25

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!