13.08.2013 Views

Final Environmental Impact Statement Rio de los Pinos Vegetation ...

Final Environmental Impact Statement Rio de los Pinos Vegetation ...

Final Environmental Impact Statement Rio de los Pinos Vegetation ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Colorado Wild Page 7<br />

it is difficult for a Forest Service employee to be present any time the area may be too wet for<br />

operations.<br />

IV. DESIGN ANY LOGGING TO MINIMIZE BLOWDOWN. When part of a stand is cut,<br />

blowdown of remaining trees is always a possibility. In<strong>de</strong>ed, consi<strong>de</strong>rable blowdown in the<br />

adjacent County Line project area after logging, as in 2007, “a large wind event blew down most<br />

of the trees that were i<strong>de</strong>ntified to remain in stands for Scenic Resources”. DEIS at 3-61.<br />

Retention of standing trees is very important for wildlife habitat and to help foster regeneration<br />

of the project area. See section V below and section II A above.<br />

The Forest Service must show how the proposed logging will not result in more than minor<br />

blowdown, even though similar logging in an adjacent area caused extensive blowdown.<br />

V. PROTECT WILDLIFE AND PLANT HABITAT. Logging is likely to adversely affect<br />

habitat for some species of wildlife. Logging should be reduced and <strong>de</strong>sign criteria strengthened<br />

to minimize such impact.<br />

A. LYNX. Lynx appear to frequently use the project area and surrounding land. See Shenk,<br />

2007 at 30, 31, showing high <strong>de</strong>nsity of lynx use <strong>de</strong>tected by both aerial and satellite means.<br />

Based on the number of smaller trees in the area, it would appear that there is good habitat for<br />

lynx’ favorite prey, snowshoe hare. See fn 2. Thus, there is likely some hare and lynx habitat in<br />

all units.<br />

The proposed action would remove standing <strong>de</strong>ad trees, which would reduce future <strong>de</strong>nning<br />

habitat. Logged areas would be very open, with limited cover. Logging would also damage or<br />

kill many small trees. In<strong>de</strong>ed, fir trees and trees less than eight inches in diameter would be<br />

removed to access larger diameter standing <strong>de</strong>ad trees un<strong>de</strong>r both action alternatives. DEIS at 3-<br />

64, -66. Thus at least some lynx habitat in the treatment units would be converted to unsuitable<br />

habitat after logging. Up to 50 percent of the un<strong>de</strong>rstory could be damaged, with 20 percent<br />

mortality. DEIS at 3-38.<br />

Un<strong>de</strong>r the no action alternative, the short-term effects of bark beetle mortality might be negative<br />

(DEIS at 3-36), but hare habitat at least would persist, as the un<strong>de</strong>rstory and fir trees of all sizes<br />

would both remain intact. And in the longer term,<br />

The analysis area would slowly convert to winter foraging and other habitat.<br />

Through time, a patchy distribution of <strong>de</strong>adfall, <strong>de</strong>ad standing and newly<br />

regenerating trees and shrubs would likely occur across the landscape. Some areas<br />

would continue to provi<strong>de</strong> <strong>de</strong>nning or foraging habitat for lynx, and may even<br />

improve in quality as an abundance of coarse woody <strong>de</strong>bris becomes available for<br />

<strong>de</strong>nning, and as areas open up and the un<strong>de</strong>rstory vegetation is released.<br />

DEIS at 3-35.<br />

Printed on recycled paper with at least 30% post-consumer content.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!