13.08.2013 Views

Final Environmental Impact Statement Rio de los Pinos Vegetation ...

Final Environmental Impact Statement Rio de los Pinos Vegetation ...

Final Environmental Impact Statement Rio de los Pinos Vegetation ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Final</strong> <strong>Environmental</strong> <strong>Impact</strong> <strong>Statement</strong> <strong>Rio</strong> <strong>de</strong> <strong>los</strong> <strong>Pinos</strong> <strong>Vegetation</strong> Management Project<br />

Table 2.4-1. Comparison of the Key Issues by Alternative.<br />

Key Issue<br />

1. Watershed<br />

Health<br />

2. Forest<br />

Condition<br />

Indicator(s)<br />

a. Total area treated (acres)<br />

b. Disturbance by watershed<br />

-50501 (6 th Level)<br />

-5050102 (7 th Level)<br />

-5050101 (7 th Level Watershed of<br />

Concern)<br />

c. Old roads re-opened (miles)<br />

d. Road maintenance (miles)<br />

e. New temp road construction<br />

(miles)<br />

a. Salvage harvesting (acres)<br />

b. Late-successional habitat<br />

structural class changed<br />

(percent)<br />

c. Spruce beetle risk rating<br />

(average)<br />

d. Heavy fuels removed<br />

from project area<br />

(tons/acre)<br />

1<br />

No Action<br />

0 acres<br />

11.5%<br />

5.3%<br />

16%<br />

0 miles<br />

8.7 miles<br />

0 miles<br />

0 acres<br />

0%<br />

Mo<strong>de</strong>rate-<br />

High<br />

0<br />

ALTERNATIVES<br />

2<br />

Full Salvage<br />

Harvest<br />

(Proposed<br />

Action)<br />

878 acres<br />

12.2%<br />

6.1%<br />

18.0%<br />

3.3 miles<br />

11.9 miles<br />

0.2 miles<br />

878 acres<br />

17.8%<br />

Mo<strong>de</strong>rate<br />

25 tons/acre<br />

3<br />

Reduced<br />

Salvage<br />

Harvest<br />

607 acres<br />

12.0%<br />

5.9%<br />

17.4%<br />

2.5 miles<br />

9.9 miles<br />

0.0 miles<br />

607 ac<br />

12.3%<br />

Mo<strong>de</strong>rate<br />

19 tons/acre<br />

Table 2.4-2 provi<strong>de</strong>s a comparison summary of effects on resources as <strong>de</strong>scribed in Chapter 3.<br />

Table 2.4-2. Comparison of Alternatives – Summary of Effects on Resources.<br />

Resource and<br />

Unit of Measure<br />

1<br />

No Action<br />

2<br />

Full Salvage<br />

Harvest<br />

ALTERNATIVES<br />

3<br />

Reduced Salvage<br />

Harvest<br />

--- FOREST CONDITION ---<br />

Acres of Sanitation/Salvage 0 878 acres 607 acres<br />

Late-successional habitat structural<br />

class changed (percent)<br />

0% 17.8% 12.3%<br />

Spruce beetle risk rating Mo<strong>de</strong>rate-High Mo<strong>de</strong>rate Mo<strong>de</strong>rate<br />

Heavy fuels removed from project<br />

area (tons/acre)<br />

0 25 tons/acre 19 tons/acre<br />

--- TIMBER MANAGEMENT/SILVICULTURE ---<br />

Harvest Volume in Million Board 0 MMBF 11.0-13.1 8.0-9.9 MMBF<br />

Feet (MMBF)<br />

MMBF<br />

Acres of Artificial Regeneration 0 acres 75 acres 56 acres<br />

--- WATERSHED and AQUATIC RESOURCES ---<br />

Percent Disturbance by Watershed<br />

130100050501 (6 th Level) 11.5% 12.2% 12.0%<br />

13010005050102 (7 th Level) 5.3% 6.1% 5.9%<br />

Chapter 2 – Alternatives Page 2-6

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!