13.08.2013 Views

Final Environmental Impact Statement Rio de los Pinos Vegetation ...

Final Environmental Impact Statement Rio de los Pinos Vegetation ...

Final Environmental Impact Statement Rio de los Pinos Vegetation ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Final</strong> <strong>Environmental</strong> <strong>Impact</strong> <strong>Statement</strong> <strong>Rio</strong> <strong>de</strong> <strong>los</strong> <strong>Pinos</strong> <strong>Vegetation</strong> Management Project<br />

Table 3.9-3. Priorty habitats and species of the Southern Rockies<br />

Priority Habitat<br />

Type<br />

Spruce/Fir<br />

BCP Priority<br />

Species<br />

Boreal owl<br />

Olive-si<strong>de</strong>d<br />

flycatcher<br />

Hammond’s<br />

flycatcher<br />

Wetlands Willet<br />

Short-eared<br />

owl<br />

BCP Potential<br />

Issues(s)<br />

Timber mgmt.,<br />

snags, altered<br />

disturbance<br />

regimes<br />

Wetland <strong>los</strong>s,<br />

<strong>de</strong>velopment<br />

Potential Influence<br />

from Project Activities<br />

Timber harvest<br />

or natural<br />

processes could<br />

eliminate snags<br />

and/or perches<br />

for Boreal owls<br />

and olive-si<strong>de</strong>d<br />

flycatchers,<br />

respectively.<br />

No major issues<br />

or activities<br />

i<strong>de</strong>ntified.<br />

Effect of<br />

Alternatives<br />

Boreal owl and olive-si<strong>de</strong>d<br />

flycatcher evaluated as R2<br />

Sensitive species. Potential for<br />

temporary, minor disturbance<br />

of individuals of all 3 species.<br />

Sufficient snags for nesting<br />

habitat expected to remain<br />

available un<strong>de</strong>r all alternatives.<br />

Cover for prey species will be<br />

sparse in some areas until<br />

un<strong>de</strong>rstory vegetation is<br />

released following harvest.<br />

Sufficient perches for olivesi<strong>de</strong>d<br />

flycatchers would remain<br />

un<strong>de</strong>r all alternatives. These<br />

habitat features would be<br />

expected to improve over time<br />

for both species. Hammond’s<br />

flycatcher habitat would be<br />

<strong>de</strong>gra<strong>de</strong>d un<strong>de</strong>r all alternatives,<br />

as they prefer mature and oldgrowth<br />

forests. Natural and<br />

management processes change<br />

this area to be less favorable<br />

for use by this species. If this<br />

is the case, individuals would<br />

be expected to utilize nearby,<br />

more suitable habitat. Harvest<br />

of some trees with active nests<br />

could occur, causing mortality<br />

to individuals and/or eggs.<br />

This could have impacts to<br />

Hammond’s flycatcher within<br />

the analysis area. However,<br />

project <strong>de</strong>sign criteria inclu<strong>de</strong>s<br />

not harvesting trees with active<br />

nests which has the potential to<br />

reduce occurrence of this type<br />

of mortality.<br />

No effects anticiapted. No<br />

habitat present.<br />

Chapter 3 – Affected Environment & <strong>Environmental</strong> Consequences Page 3-60

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!