13.08.2013 Views

Final Environmental Impact Statement Rio de los Pinos Vegetation ...

Final Environmental Impact Statement Rio de los Pinos Vegetation ...

Final Environmental Impact Statement Rio de los Pinos Vegetation ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Final</strong> <strong>Environmental</strong> <strong>Impact</strong> <strong>Statement</strong> <strong>Rio</strong> <strong>de</strong> <strong>los</strong> <strong>Pinos</strong> <strong>Vegetation</strong> Management Project<br />

less equipment and activities in the area will also lessen opportunities for noxious weed spread<br />

and/or introduction.<br />

There is still a low risk of spread and/or introduction of noxious weeds in the Analysis Area,<br />

even without the implementation of the project. The existing road infrastructure within, and<br />

leading to the Analysis Area will still be maintained. This will allow for periodic soil disturbance<br />

along roadways and heavy equipment activities that may be hosts for weed seed transport.<br />

Established noxious weed infestations, if not treated will likely continue to spread and provi<strong>de</strong> a<br />

seed source for new infestations. Other activities and users of the area may also be carriers of<br />

weed seed and may cause soil disturbance that may contribute to the establishment and/or spread<br />

on noxious weeds within the Analysis Area and the proposed haul route. There will also be a<br />

certain amount of natural soil disturbance from trees falling, wildlife digging, etc. and natural<br />

seed dispersal from wind and wildlife. Additionally, without the project implementation,<br />

monitoring of the area would be of lower priority and additional funding that would have been<br />

generated by the project would not be available for noxious weed control.<br />

Alternative 2 – Full Salvage Harvest<br />

This alternative will have a mo<strong>de</strong>rate risk for noxious weed spread and/or introduction. There<br />

have been infestations of Canada Thistle in and near the Analysis Area. This elevates the<br />

potential for noxious weed seed to be available in the soil. Additional soil disturbance besi<strong>de</strong>s<br />

the normal road maintenance will also occur with the upgrading of the current roads and<br />

possibility of borrow material and gravel being hauled in for use on the roads. The increased<br />

activity with haul trucks, pickups and heavy equipment will heighten the possibility for transport<br />

of weed seed. Soil disturbance from the log skidding operation could be a seed transport<br />

possibility and soil disturbance possibility. Log skidding may also present an opportunity for<br />

noxious weed establishment in areas out of site from the main roads, which makes it difficult to<br />

locate infestations early on.<br />

Factors that are contributing to the project presenting mo<strong>de</strong>rate risk instead of high risk are:<br />

• Canada Thistle is the only noxious weed known to be in or near the Analysis Area.<br />

• Canada Thistle is not very common in the Analysis Area<br />

• Canada Thistle is very treatable and easy to control if caught early<br />

• Project <strong>de</strong>sign criteria are in place to lessen the introduction of new weed species and the<br />

spread of Canada Thistle.<br />

• KV funds are planned for monitoring and treatment of the area after the project is<br />

completed<br />

Alternative 3 – Reduced Salvage Harvest<br />

This alternative will have the same effects as Alternative 2 but with a low mo<strong>de</strong>rate risk for<br />

noxious weed spread and/or introduction. By not harvesting timber in the wettest areas, the risk<br />

is reduced primarily because of these factors:<br />

• The wettest areas provi<strong>de</strong> the greatest risk for noxious weed establishment and spread<br />

because of the excellent growing conditions<br />

• Often times, wet areas or riparian areas preclu<strong>de</strong> the use of many herbici<strong>de</strong>s due to label<br />

restrictions, which makes eradication very difficult and expensive<br />

Chapter 3 – Affected Environment & <strong>Environmental</strong> Consequences Page 3-100

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!