THESIS

More documents

Recommendations

Info

LITERATURE CITED Allard, R.W. 1992. Predictive Methods for Germplasm Identification, pp. 119-146. In H.T. Stalker and J.P. Murphy, eds. Plant breeding in the 1990s. CAB International, Wallingford, Oxon, UK. Anis, M., S. Baksh and N. Iqbal. 1994. Cytogenetic studied on F1 hybrids, S. incanum x S. melongena var. American Wonder. Cytologia 59(4): 433-436. Ano, G., Y. Hebert, P. Prior and C.M. Messiaen. 1991. A new source of resistance to bacterial wilt of eggplants btained from a cross Solanum aethiopicum L. x Solanum melongena L. Agronomie 11: 555-560. Arumunganathan, K. and E. Erale. 1991. Estimation of nuclear DNA content of plants by flow cytometry. Plant Mol. Biol. Rep. 9: 229-241. Asao, H., S. Arai, T. Sato and M. Hirai. 1994. Characteristics of a somatic hybrid between Solanum melongena L. and Solanum sanitwongsei Craib. Breed Sci. 44: 301-305. Backer, C.A. and R.C.B.V. Den Brink. 1965. Flora of Java (Spermatophytes only) Vol. II, Angiospermae, Families 111-160. N.V.P. Noordhoff - Groningen - The Netherlands. Baksh, S. and M. Iqbal. 1979. Compatibility relationships in some non tuberous species of Solanum. J. Hortic. Sci. 54 (2): 163. Beg, M.Z. and A.H. Khan. 1988. The mechanism of speciation and evolutionary trend in Solanum nigrum complex. Cytologia 54(2): 297-306. 135
, and M. Ahmand.1989. Morphological deversification and genetic isolating mechanism between some members of Solanum nigrum complex. Cytologia 54(3): 419-424. Behera, T.K. and N. Singh. 2002a. Inter-specific hybridization in eggplant for resistance to shoot and fruit borer. Capsicum and Eggplant Newsletter 21: 102-105. and . 2002b. Inter-specific crosses between eggplant (Solanum melongena L.) with related Solanum species. Scientia Horticulturae 95: 165- 172. Bennett, M.D. and J.B. Smith. 1976. Nuclear DNA amounts in angiosperms. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. London. B. 274: 227-271. Bhaduri, P.N. 1951. Inter-relationship of non-tuberous species of Solanum with some considerations on the origin of brinjal, S. melognena. Indian J. Genet. 11: 75-82. Bletsos, F.A., D.G. Roupakias and C.C. Thanassoulopoulos. 2000. Gene transfer from wild Solanum species to eggplant culitvars: prospects and limitations. Acta Hort. 552: 71-78. Blesstos, F.A., D.G. Roupakias, M.L. Tsaktsira, A.B. Scaltsojannes and C.C. Thanassoulopoulos. 1998. Interspecific hybrids between three eggplant (Solanum melongena L.) cultivars and two wild species (Solanum torvum Sw. and Solanum sismbriifolium Lam.). Plant Breeding 117: 159-164. Blomqvist, M.M. and N.T. Ban. 1999. Solanum L., Solanum sanitwongsei Craib and Solanum trilobatum L., pp. 186-220. In L.S. de Padua, N. Bunyapraphatsara and R.H.M.J. Lemmends, eds. PROSEA: Plant Resources of South-East Asia Vol. 12(1) Medicinal and Poisonous Plants 136
Page 1:
THESIS GENETIC DIVERSITY IN THE SOU
Page 5 and 6:
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to ex
Page 7 and 8:
LIST OF TABLES Table Page 1 Ninety
Page 9 and 10:
LIST OF FIGURES Figure Page 1 Selec
Page 11 and 12:
LIST OF FIGURES (Continued) Figure
Page 13 and 14:
LIST OF FIGURES (Continued) Appendi
Page 15 and 16:
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS cm = centimet
Page 17 and 18:
Asian Vegetable Research and Develo
Page 19 and 20:
OBJECTIVES 1. To characterize using
Page 21 and 22:
campanulate, rotate or copular, mos
Page 23 and 24:
Moreover, genetic diversity has an
Page 25 and 26:
Therefore, germplasm characterizati
Page 27 and 28:
some degree from each other and the
Page 29 and 30:
Interspecific hybrids between wild
Page 31 and 32:
Moreover, lines of S. melongena sho
Page 33 and 34:
(qualitative) traits. The cluster a
Page 35 and 36:
Plots of the clustering statistics
Page 37 and 38:
Table 1 (Continued) Temporary No. S
Page 39 and 40:
2. Genetic relationships of Solanum
Page 41 and 42:
pollen grains from randomly selecte
Page 43 and 44:
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION In this stud
Page 45 and 46:
Furthermore, TS02950 collected in C
Page 47 and 48:
distinct from those species. Fruit
Page 49 and 50:
yellow and globose. While, TS001447
Page 51 and 52:
Table 4 Identification of 43 access
Page 53 and 54:
Table 5 Re-identification of 5 acce
Page 55 and 56:
accessions, hence, considered to ha
Page 57 and 58:
Figure 1 Selected items from PROC U
Page 59 and 60:
Table 7 Correlation coefficients sc
Page 61 and 62:
N a m e o f V a r i a b l e o r C l
Page 63 and 64:
1.2.2 Cluster analysis I. Ratio sca
Page 65 and 66:
P S E U D O F S T A T I S T I C Sto
Page 67 and 68:
C U B I C C L U S T E R I N G C R I
Page 69 and 70:
Table 9 Accessions number of Solanu
Page 71 and 72:
Table 9 (Continued) Cluster Subclus
Page 73 and 74:
Stratifying the accessions into 10
Page 75 and 76:
(single fruit). It has also the wid
Page 77 and 78:
were collected in Laos, while S. ma
Page 79 and 80:
II. Nominal traits (qualitative tra
Page 81 and 82:
Table 11 (Continued) Nominal traits
Page 83 and 84:
The similarity coefficient values (
Page 85 and 86:
(3 accessions). Subclaster A is cha
Page 87 and 88:
8 6 4 Figure 7 Cluster analysis of
Page 89 and 90:
Table 12 (Continued) Cluster Subclu
Page 91 and 92:
However, the determination of the m
Page 93 and 94:
This result is in agreement with th
Page 95 and 96:
herbicide (atrazine) resistant trai
Page 97 and 98:
3) Cross - compatibility among S. a
Page 99 and 100: when the larger-flowered species we
Page 101 and 102: Table 14 Interspecific crossability
Page 103 and 104: Table 15 Interspecific crossability
Page 105 and 106: Table 17 Intra- and interspecific c
Page 107 and 108: Table 18 (Continued) Cross combinat
Page 109 and 110: A B C D E F G H Figure 8 The hybrid
Page 111 and 112: Figure 10 F1 hybrid plant from S. m
Page 113 and 114: Confirmation of interspecific hybri
Page 115 and 116: However, pollen fertility of the in
Page 117 and 118: Table 19 The pollen fertility of F1
Page 119 and 120: Table 21 (Continued) Species Access
Page 121 and 122: S00860) showed a same ploidy level
Page 123 and 124: Moreover, an accurate determination
Page 125 and 126: S. americanum (S00269) (2n) S. amer
Page 127 and 128: S. villosum (S00854) (4n) S. villos
Page 129 and 130: S. villosum (S00860) (4n) S. villos
Page 131 and 132: Moreover, the crosses between S. am
Page 133 and 134: S. melongena (S00625) S. melongena
Page 135 and 136: S. melongena (S00809) F1 S. villosu
Page 137 and 138: S. americanum (S00861) S. americanu
Page 139 and 140: S. americanum (S00269) S. americanu
Page 141 and 142: S. villosum (TS02600) F1 S. villosu
Page 143 and 144: S. villosum (S00854) F1 S. american
Page 145 and 146: S. nigrum (TS02930) F1 S. americanu
Page 147 and 148: 132 For the interspecific crossing
Page 149: S. nigrum). For the interspecific c
Page 153 and 154: 138 Collonnier, C., I. Fock, V. Kas
Page 155 and 156: and J.A. Chweya. 1997. Black Nights
Page 157 and 158: and . 1988b. Organelle composition
Page 159 and 160: Laban, J.C.G. 2003. Genetic Diversi
Page 161 and 162: spinous Solanums. Theoret. Appl. Ge
Page 163 and 164: Singh, J. and M. Rai. 2005. Eggplan
Page 165 and 166: APPENDICES 150
Page 167 and 168: SEEDLING DATA AVRDC-GRSU CHARACTERI
Page 169 and 170: S300 Leaf blade tip angle 1 = Very
Page 171 and 172: S530 Fruit length/breadth ratio 1 =
Page 173 and 174: S640 Fruit calyx length (N=10) ____
Page 175 and 176: Appendix Table A1 Characterization
Page 177 and 178: Appendix Table A1 (Continued) Tempo
Page 201 and 202:
Appendix Table A4 List of morpholog
Page 203 and 204:
Appendix Figure A2 Morphological ch
Page 205 and 206:
Appendix Figure A8 Morphological ch
Page 207 and 208:
Appendix B Identification of specie
Page 209 and 210:
Moments N 91 Sum Weights 91 Mean 7.
Page 211 and 212:
Moment N 91 Sum Weights 91 Mean 101
Page 213 and 214:
Moments N 91 Sum Weights 91 Mean 10
Page 215 and 216:
Page 217 and 218:
Page 219 and 220:
Page 221 and 222:
Page 223 and 224:
Page 225 and 226:
show all

THESIS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?