THESIS
THESIS
THESIS
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
may not be the true hybrids because F1 hybrid plants have high pollen fertility and<br />
morphological characters were not intermediate when compare to their parent (Table<br />
15 and Figure 22).<br />
Furthermore, when S. melongena was used as male parent, only one accession<br />
S00860 of S. villosum (collected in Japan) was crossable with all accessions of S.<br />
melongena may be due to the flower of S00860 is bigger than others accession of S.<br />
villosum. However, only the hybrid fruits were obtained from the crosses between S.<br />
melongena and S. villosum but their seeds were abortive. Moreover, most of them fell<br />
before harvesting stage. In the case of embryo culture, the embryos of hybrid fruits<br />
from S. villosum x S. melongena were rescued but no hybrid plants were obtained<br />
(Figure 11). Similarly, the interspecific hybrids have also been made between S.<br />
melongena and S. sisymbriifolium by embryo rescuing but they still fail to develop<br />
within a few days (Sharma et al., 1984). Moreover, the protoplast culture and somatic<br />
hybridization could be useful in overcoming the pre- and post- fertilization barriers<br />
(Fournier et al., 1995) and was successful in several cases in previous literature. This<br />
technique could be useful to rescue the hybrids from S. villosum and S. melongena.<br />
Although the hybrid fruits were set, most of them fell before harvesting. In<br />
case of embryo culture, the embryo of hybrid fruits from the two cross combinations;<br />
S. villosum (S00860) x S. melongena (S00022), S. villosum (S00860) x S. melongena<br />
(S00809) (Figure 11), were fail. Similarly, the interspecific hybrids have also been<br />
made between S. melongena and S. sisymbriifolium by embryo rescuing but they still<br />
fail to develop within a few days (Sharma et al., 1984).<br />
The crosses between S. melongena x S. nigrum was successful only the<br />
crossing from S00809 x TS02930 which 49.1 % fruit setting (Table 16). The crossing<br />
between S00809 x TS02930 was ontained but this may not be true hybrid. This<br />
finding is in contrast to result obtained by Singh et al. (2002) who reported that S.<br />
nigrum were not crossable to S. melongena. However, interspecific somatic hybrids<br />
were developed by fusing protoplast of S. melongena with S. nigrum L. to transfer<br />
79