18.08.2013 Views

THESIS

THESIS

THESIS

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

may not be the true hybrids because F1 hybrid plants have high pollen fertility and<br />

morphological characters were not intermediate when compare to their parent (Table<br />

15 and Figure 22).<br />

Furthermore, when S. melongena was used as male parent, only one accession<br />

S00860 of S. villosum (collected in Japan) was crossable with all accessions of S.<br />

melongena may be due to the flower of S00860 is bigger than others accession of S.<br />

villosum. However, only the hybrid fruits were obtained from the crosses between S.<br />

melongena and S. villosum but their seeds were abortive. Moreover, most of them fell<br />

before harvesting stage. In the case of embryo culture, the embryos of hybrid fruits<br />

from S. villosum x S. melongena were rescued but no hybrid plants were obtained<br />

(Figure 11). Similarly, the interspecific hybrids have also been made between S.<br />

melongena and S. sisymbriifolium by embryo rescuing but they still fail to develop<br />

within a few days (Sharma et al., 1984). Moreover, the protoplast culture and somatic<br />

hybridization could be useful in overcoming the pre- and post- fertilization barriers<br />

(Fournier et al., 1995) and was successful in several cases in previous literature. This<br />

technique could be useful to rescue the hybrids from S. villosum and S. melongena.<br />

Although the hybrid fruits were set, most of them fell before harvesting. In<br />

case of embryo culture, the embryo of hybrid fruits from the two cross combinations;<br />

S. villosum (S00860) x S. melongena (S00022), S. villosum (S00860) x S. melongena<br />

(S00809) (Figure 11), were fail. Similarly, the interspecific hybrids have also been<br />

made between S. melongena and S. sisymbriifolium by embryo rescuing but they still<br />

fail to develop within a few days (Sharma et al., 1984).<br />

The crosses between S. melongena x S. nigrum was successful only the<br />

crossing from S00809 x TS02930 which 49.1 % fruit setting (Table 16). The crossing<br />

between S00809 x TS02930 was ontained but this may not be true hybrid. This<br />

finding is in contrast to result obtained by Singh et al. (2002) who reported that S.<br />

nigrum were not crossable to S. melongena. However, interspecific somatic hybrids<br />

were developed by fusing protoplast of S. melongena with S. nigrum L. to transfer<br />

79

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!