THESIS
THESIS
THESIS
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
1) Plant breadth<br />
2) Plant branching<br />
3) Number of flowers per inflorescence<br />
4) Number of fruits per infructescence<br />
5) Germination period<br />
6) Fruit stalk length<br />
7) Fruit length<br />
8) Fruit breadth<br />
9) Cotyledon leaf length/width ratio<br />
10) Seed weight<br />
However, the remaining four sets of traits (Table 8) considered to be<br />
highly correlated were further examined. For each set, the trait that is normally<br />
distributed was chosen to represent that set. To illustrate this selection process, the set<br />
containing petiole length, leaf blade length and leaf blade width was considered.<br />
Using the Shrapiro-Wilk test for normality from the PROC UNIVARIATE output<br />
(Appendix Figure B7, B8 and B9), the p-values of these traits were 0.0618, 0.0074<br />
and 0.0001, respectively. Such set exhibited normal distribution. However, the leaf<br />
blade width was more normal distribution compared to leaf blade length and petiole<br />
length, therefore, leaf blade width was chosen to present that set. In case of plant<br />
height and flowering time set of traits, both p-values were equal to 0.0001. The<br />
flowering time was chosen to present that set because plant height exhibited nonnormal<br />
distribution but flowering time was normal distribution. For cotyledon leaf<br />
length and cotyledon leaf width set of traits, both traits were more normal distribution.<br />
The cotyledon leaf width was chosen over cotyledon leaf length because the<br />
measurement of the former was considered to be easier and p-value (0.0005) was<br />
almost to 0.0001 (Manigbas, 2005).<br />
43