Toll Facility Safety Study Report to Congress - About
Toll Facility Safety Study Report to Congress - About
Toll Facility Safety Study Report to Congress - About
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Toll</strong> <strong>Facility</strong> <strong>Safety</strong> <strong>Study</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>to</strong> <strong>Congress</strong><br />
Appendix D – Agency Site Visits<br />
This section presents findings according <strong>to</strong> the following contributing fac<strong>to</strong>rs that the study team<br />
<strong>to</strong>ok note of during the site visits. Along with each contributing fac<strong>to</strong>r are strategies that the<br />
various sites have implemented <strong>to</strong> address these challenges.<br />
Merging / Lane Changing Behavior<br />
Speeding<br />
Driver Confusion and Distraction<br />
Worker Exposure <strong>to</strong> Vehicles<br />
Environmental Issues<br />
Ergonomics<br />
Assault<br />
Note that much of the information presented here was also presented, <strong>to</strong>gether with a synthesis of<br />
the interviews and the workshop, in Section 4, Findings – Fac<strong>to</strong>rs Affecting <strong>Safety</strong> at <strong>Toll</strong><br />
Plazas.<br />
Merging / Lane Changing Behavior<br />
<strong>Toll</strong> plazas present unique challenges in terms of lane-changing behavior and merging. Many<br />
plazas operate much like a complex intersection (i.e., there are on-ramps or off-ramps in close<br />
proximity <strong>to</strong> the plaza, which creates excessive weaving maneuvers).<br />
Speed variance between ETC and cash-paying cus<strong>to</strong>mers is a challenge faced by all plazas<br />
accepting both electronic and cash payment. <strong>Toll</strong> authorities across the country have tackled this<br />
problem in a variety of ways. To start, many agencies make a standard practice of positioning<br />
their ETC lanes <strong>to</strong> the left side of their plazas, with the idea that the faster-moving traffic will be<br />
<strong>to</strong> the left side of the roadway. This practice appears <strong>to</strong> be effective except in situations where<br />
there are on-ramps or off-ramps in close proximity <strong>to</strong> the plaza, in which case this practice<br />
causes unnecessary weaving maneuvers. To combat this, many agencies have taken <strong>to</strong><br />
positioning dedicated-ETC lanes <strong>to</strong> both the left and right side of certain plazas.<br />
Beyond this, some agencies have gone <strong>to</strong>ward channelizing ETC traffic well in advance of the<br />
plaza <strong>to</strong> reduce last-minute lane changes, and <strong>to</strong> channelize ETC traffic downstream of the plaza<br />
<strong>to</strong> delay merging of traffic. Other agencies have begun adding a buffer lane between the ETC<br />
lanes and cash or mixed-use lanes or <strong>to</strong> use physical separation (such as with a concrete barrier)<br />
for the higher-speed traffic.<br />
More common than physical separation, many agencies make use of delinea<strong>to</strong>rs. However,<br />
visibility can be an issue. To combat this problem, one agency replaced their solid white<br />
delinea<strong>to</strong>rs with wide yellow sergeant-striped delinea<strong>to</strong>rs. Others have found that visibility was<br />
improved after positioning the delinea<strong>to</strong>rs in a “bowling pin” configuration instead of a straight<br />
line. For those agencies that face an additional challenge in that their lane assignments change<br />
throughout the day, pop-up delinea<strong>to</strong>rs can be a good approach. However, some agencies in<br />
colder climates have found that pop-up delinea<strong>to</strong>rs do not perform so well during snow and icy<br />
Appendix D – Agency Site Visits Page D-1