01.10.2013 Views

Toll Facility Safety Study Report to Congress - About

Toll Facility Safety Study Report to Congress - About

Toll Facility Safety Study Report to Congress - About

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Toll</strong> <strong>Facility</strong> <strong>Safety</strong> <strong>Study</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>to</strong> <strong>Congress</strong><br />

stream of the booth. This reduces the issue of vehicles not being able <strong>to</strong> see collec<strong>to</strong>rs crossing<br />

behind booths (and collec<strong>to</strong>rs not being able <strong>to</strong> see vehicles around booths). However, it also<br />

forces collec<strong>to</strong>rs <strong>to</strong> cross traffic lanes in an area where vehicles do not typically s<strong>to</strong>p. Another<br />

agency had placed their crosswalks at a significant distance downstream of the booths. This<br />

provided the collec<strong>to</strong>rs with somewhat better sight lines and more time between vehicle<br />

acceleration (from the booth) and the crossing point. However, it also meant that collec<strong>to</strong>rs had<br />

a more difficult time making eye contact with s<strong>to</strong>pped vehicles and with fellow collec<strong>to</strong>rs in<br />

booths that might offer mutual support. There was also significant diversity in the methods used<br />

<strong>to</strong> demark the locations where collec<strong>to</strong>rs should cross. Most agencies used crosswalks painted<br />

in<strong>to</strong> the pavement and jersey barriers, or railings (with openings at the crosswalks) <strong>to</strong> encourage<br />

workers <strong>to</strong> use the cross-walk. However, a small number of agencies were not as restrictive as <strong>to</strong><br />

where collec<strong>to</strong>rs could cross – while they may still use painted crosswalks, they do not<br />

physically channel collec<strong>to</strong>rs <strong>to</strong> openings with gates, etc. for fear that these barriers could present<br />

dangerous obstructions if a collec<strong>to</strong>r was outside of the cross-walk area and needed <strong>to</strong> quickly<br />

get out of the travel lanes.<br />

Related <strong>to</strong> crosswalks, most agencies visited had implemented some type of mitigation strategy<br />

<strong>to</strong> remind workers that they were crossing live lanes of traffic. At the most extreme end, two of<br />

the agencies visited made use of “bars.” These are physical gates adopted from use on fire trucks<br />

that must be carefully opened <strong>to</strong> enter in<strong>to</strong> the travel lanes, but can be easily pushed through <strong>to</strong><br />

get out of the travel lane. At the other end of the spectrum a number of agencies had simply<br />

stenciled or painted messages on the curbs abutting the travel lanes. These messages included<br />

“Look ” and “Watch for Traffic.” Through conversations with collec<strong>to</strong>rs, the general<br />

consensus was that such messages tended <strong>to</strong> be effective for new employees or when first added,<br />

but became just part of the background and were ignored over time.<br />

Several agencies visited stressed the importance of hands-free crossing. Having both hands free<br />

while crossing makes it easier for collec<strong>to</strong>rs <strong>to</strong> signal <strong>to</strong> oncoming traffic and <strong>to</strong> catch themselves<br />

if they fall. To facilitate hands-free crossing, a strategy mentioned by many agencies visited was<br />

<strong>to</strong> issue collec<strong>to</strong>rs shoulder bags or backpacks in which <strong>to</strong> carry their personal belongings <strong>to</strong> the<br />

booth (e.g., a sweater or bottle of water). In some cases the bag provided was a high-visibility<br />

color, such as orange, <strong>to</strong> make the collec<strong>to</strong>r more visible <strong>to</strong> mo<strong>to</strong>rists. One agency visited has<br />

even replaced their collec<strong>to</strong>r’s cash drawers with cash bags that they can slip in<strong>to</strong> a shoulder bag<br />

for completely hands-free crossing. Most collec<strong>to</strong>rs that the team talked with spoke favorably<br />

about using carry bags.<br />

Other mitigation strategies related <strong>to</strong> worker safety in travel lanes included requiring workers <strong>to</strong><br />

look over their shoulder (<strong>to</strong>ward traffic) every few steps after closing barriers, providing break<br />

areas on either side of plaza facilities <strong>to</strong> minimize the number of lanes that need <strong>to</strong> be crossed,<br />

using attenua<strong>to</strong>r trucks for all maintenance activities that require a lane closure, using side-fire<br />

cameras <strong>to</strong> allow for maintenance work without closing a lane (i.e., cameras are mounted by the<br />

roadside instead of overhead), and requiring maintenance workers <strong>to</strong> use a “buddy” system, with<br />

one worker watching for unsafe traffic conditions.<br />

Environmental Issues<br />

<strong>Toll</strong> collec<strong>to</strong>rs are exposed <strong>to</strong> a range of environmental hazards on the job, such as excessive<br />

noise and emissions. Through the site visits, the team found that agencies typically perform<br />

some combination of the following mitigation strategies <strong>to</strong> lessen the impact of these hazards:<br />

Appendix D – Agency Site Visits Page D-6

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!