Toll Facility Safety Study Report to Congress - About
Toll Facility Safety Study Report to Congress - About
Toll Facility Safety Study Report to Congress - About
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Toll</strong> <strong>Facility</strong> <strong>Safety</strong> <strong>Study</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>to</strong> <strong>Congress</strong><br />
Appendix G – Agency Workshop / Workshop Ratings<br />
Participants of the June 25/26 <strong>Toll</strong> <strong>Facility</strong> <strong>Safety</strong> <strong>Study</strong> Workshop were asked <strong>to</strong> review each of<br />
the safety strategies that the study team had uncovered throughout the course of this study. The<br />
team presented the strategies in 7 categories and the 20 participants were asked <strong>to</strong> select and rank<br />
3 strategies within each category that they believed would have the greatest potential <strong>to</strong> improve<br />
safety for both workers and cus<strong>to</strong>mers at <strong>to</strong>ll plazas. The tables that follow present the workshop<br />
findings. Each table represents one category; the categories of challenges include: Worker<br />
Exposure <strong>to</strong> Vehicles; Environmental Issues; Ergonomics; Assault 13 ; Merging and Lane<br />
Changing; Speeding; and Driver Confusion and Distraction. Note that the categories presented<br />
in the workshop differ slightly from the categories presented in this report. The table titles<br />
indicate the category names as presented at the workshop while a footnote below each table<br />
indicates the title of the category as presented in Section 4 of this report.<br />
The results are ranked by the number of participants who selected the strategy as among the <strong>to</strong>p<br />
three most effective strategies <strong>to</strong> improve safety in that category. The strategies are listed in the<br />
first column, followed by the number and percent of participants who thought it would be the<br />
most effective, second most effective, and third most effective. The last two columns show the<br />
number and percentage of respondents who selected the strategy as one of the <strong>to</strong>p three most<br />
effective in that particular category of strategies.<br />
For example, for the first strategy listed as a potential option for addressing safety issues<br />
resulting from merging and lane changing behavior, 15 participants (75 percent) indicated that<br />
this was the strategy with the greatest potential <strong>to</strong> improve safety for workers and cus<strong>to</strong>mers at<br />
<strong>to</strong>ll plazas. Three respondents thought this would be the second most effective strategy, resulting<br />
in 90 percent of respondents selecting this as one of the <strong>to</strong>p three strategies <strong>to</strong> consider when<br />
addressing safety issues resulting from merging and lane changing behaviors.<br />
Much of the information gathered through the agency workshop is presented, <strong>to</strong>gether with a<br />
synthesis of the site visits and interviews, in Section 4, Findings – Fac<strong>to</strong>rs Affecting <strong>Safety</strong> at<br />
<strong>Toll</strong> Plazas.<br />
13<br />
Note that data for the category entitled “Assault” was not able <strong>to</strong> be retained from the system due <strong>to</strong> a power<br />
outage that occurred during the workshop.<br />
Appendix G – Agency Workshop / Workshop Ratings Page G-1