10.10.2013 Views

Translation Series No.1211

Translation Series No.1211

Translation Series No.1211

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

cm<br />

100<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

- 1 15-<br />

customarily the total length from the point of the snout to the end of<br />

the dorsal (mostly longest) ray of the tail fin.<br />

In order to be able to compare the two statements, we have<br />

taken both length measurements in 250 salmon and calculated the obvious-<br />

ly linear relation (Fig. 28). The measurement of the total length and of<br />

the fork length has been carried out in such a manner that they were based<br />

in every case on centimetres rounded off downwards. The fish of the group<br />

20<br />

50 ' m 90 lIC Lcm •<br />

Fig. 28. Relation between fork length (11.) end<br />

length (Lt ).<br />

•<br />

[1). 2971<br />

72 cm are thus on an average 72.5 cm long. This correction has been ap-<br />

plied in all oases before an evaluation was carried out. The statements<br />

given here.are all corrected values.<br />

total length Lt<br />

The following relation exists between fork length Lf and the<br />

Lf m -1.2256 0.9578 Lt<br />

t 1.2796 + 1.0441 Lf.<br />

L<br />

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!