Translation Series No.1211

- 141 -
yeAy-cle..es
Table 35. The strength of the ye-are-Es-seta of smolt as number
of salmon per 100,000 hooks according to the line captures
per unit effort of Table 15.
■•■•■■
Number Evaluation
Year's in 2nd Eval- figure re-
A.+ A.1+ A.2+ A.3+ A.4+ À.5+ a. 3rd- uation calculated
set year figure after Kând-
é.;“ott ler 19 64
"Wy)
.
1953 8 .
•
1954 •
• . • 61 ' 2
• 1955
195,6 '
- 409 '62 .
568 . ' 540 • . 23
5 • 1
1 - 4
(1683) 1
1108
(17)
11
1957 3
1958 • 27
1959 6
1621
411 .
833
394
233
143
- 11"
5
11
3 -
6
2015
644
976 -
20
6
i0
12
8
11
,
• 1960
1961
1962
1
2
1425
593 :,
187
•.
•
-
1612
(803)1
16
• • (8)
17
13 .
.
.
0 7 909 318 29 4 1 1225 12
1 •Figures completed through estimates.
[0 = average]
hooks of 15 and 25 mm openings. Chrzan also mentions that the enforced
cowseyve,t,,m,
Hprefferieft4i-ea during the war had thé consequence that there was a larger
share of older fish than before and afterwards. • leaf — ciesses
Let us flow attempt to compare the individual yettele-eebs of
smolt with one another in regard to their strength. With the aid of the
entries in Table 33 and the line •keeee per unit effort in Table 15 com-
parable values have been assembled. ih,Table 35. For an entirely exact com-
Yee-r-ct,ts
parison each ye.selle-se4 would have. tp te taken into account from its first
appearance in the exploited phase until its:disappearance. Since the sea
ye e
year classes A.1+ and A.2+ of every yeer-I-e-set of gmolt supply on an aver-
age more than 95 per cent of the yields, we can use for the compai.ison
also the figures for these two classes. With the aid of the mean numerical
.ratio of A.1+ to A.2+ for 1956-1960 one can in addition estimate the prob-
able total number of the individuals for the capture per unit effort for