Translation Series No.1211
Translation Series No.1211
Translation Series No.1211
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
- 85 -<br />
the relative amount of eggs in the salmon for practical use. The mean<br />
values vary for different Swedish rivers from 1060 to 1400 eggs per kg<br />
salmon, in the Vistula the valùes lie around 1400. The correlation coef-<br />
ficient is 0.6624 for the Ulme-Xlv, 0.7512 for the river Ljusnan. B. Carlin<br />
(1951) calculated a linear relation between number of eggs and weight of<br />
salmon for fish weighing 2 to 14 kg.<br />
With the aid of very careful statistical analyses, J. A. Pope,<br />
D. H. Mill's, and W. M. Shearer (1961) have treated the fertility of the<br />
Atlantic salmon.. The fish investigated were substantially smaller than the<br />
Swedish salmon and had lengths of 47.5 to 95.0 cm, average 70 cm (about<br />
3.14 kg). Pope et al. found that the changes in the number of eggs oan be<br />
traced to 75 per cent of the different lengths of the fish and only to 7<br />
per cent to the weight of the salmon. The changes in the condition of the<br />
salmon during the upstream migration are reflected in considerable fluct-<br />
uations'in weight. There.does not exist a linear relation between number<br />
of :. eggs and weight of the salmon.<br />
Acording to the authors cited, the relation between length and<br />
number of eggii can be expressed best through the allometric growth formula<br />
N = cL b , where N is the number of eggs, L the length, and c and b are con-<br />
stants. According to . the investigations of Pope et al., b appears to be a<br />
universal constant of the magnitude 2.3345. On the other hand, c character<br />
izes probably the influence of the environment. Annual differences in the<br />
values for one river were not significant, but there were significant dif-<br />
ferences between individual rivers. The above formula can be used generally .<br />
with an error of ± 10 Per cent. Since the fertility can vary significantly<br />
between individual rivers,'we have to expect a priori a greater scattering<br />
• [P. 278 1<br />
of the individual values. for egg .counts of sample catches in the sea than