10.10.2013 Views

Translation Series No.1211

Translation Series No.1211

Translation Series No.1211

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

- 85 -<br />

the relative amount of eggs in the salmon for practical use. The mean<br />

values vary for different Swedish rivers from 1060 to 1400 eggs per kg<br />

salmon, in the Vistula the valùes lie around 1400. The correlation coef-<br />

ficient is 0.6624 for the Ulme-Xlv, 0.7512 for the river Ljusnan. B. Carlin<br />

(1951) calculated a linear relation between number of eggs and weight of<br />

salmon for fish weighing 2 to 14 kg.<br />

With the aid of very careful statistical analyses, J. A. Pope,<br />

D. H. Mill's, and W. M. Shearer (1961) have treated the fertility of the<br />

Atlantic salmon.. The fish investigated were substantially smaller than the<br />

Swedish salmon and had lengths of 47.5 to 95.0 cm, average 70 cm (about<br />

3.14 kg). Pope et al. found that the changes in the number of eggs oan be<br />

traced to 75 per cent of the different lengths of the fish and only to 7<br />

per cent to the weight of the salmon. The changes in the condition of the<br />

salmon during the upstream migration are reflected in considerable fluct-<br />

uations'in weight. There.does not exist a linear relation between number<br />

of :. eggs and weight of the salmon.<br />

Acording to the authors cited, the relation between length and<br />

number of eggii can be expressed best through the allometric growth formula<br />

N = cL b , where N is the number of eggs, L the length, and c and b are con-<br />

stants. According to . the investigations of Pope et al., b appears to be a<br />

universal constant of the magnitude 2.3345. On the other hand, c character<br />

izes probably the influence of the environment. Annual differences in the<br />

values for one river were not significant, but there were significant dif-<br />

ferences between individual rivers. The above formula can be used generally .<br />

with an error of ± 10 Per cent. Since the fertility can vary significantly<br />

between individual rivers,'we have to expect a priori a greater scattering<br />

• [P. 278 1<br />

of the individual values. for egg .counts of sample catches in the sea than

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!