(EU) and the Common Market of the South (MERCOSUR)? - FDCL

More documents

Recommendations

Info

96 “We have tried to explain how much we believe the Singapore issues, such as trade facilitation, are the key, not the hindrance, to development.”280 In view of this immense significance given to the Singapore-issues by the European Commission, the BBC in the run-up to Cancún could not resist to spread the news that henceforth the focus would be on the “Brussels-issues.” 281 And especially two of these Brussels-issues are of special importance for the EU: Investment and government procurement. In this context the Commission envisions the following with respect to the investment issue: “We believe that it is in the interest of all countries to create a more stable and transparent climate for FDI world-wide. In our view, the WTO should focus on FDI, leaving aside short-term capital movements. Non-discrimination, transparency and predictability of domestic laws applicable to FDI should be the guiding principles for the investment framework that we envisage to negotiate. The admission of investors should be dealt with following a gradual approach: each government should be able to decide which sectors can be opened to foreign investors and which ones cannot, according to transparent, positive and non-discriminatory commitments. Each government should also preserve the right to regulate the economic activity within its territory, including in the fields of development, environment and social conditions. The dispute settlement mechanism should be that of the WTO. Investor-to- State arbitration does not fit in the WTO framework, and should be left to bilateral agreements. Rules on investment protection, for instance in case of expropriation, could also be discussed, if WTO Members found it useful. Any such rules, however, must not affect a host country’s right to regulate, in a non-discriminatory manner, the behavior of firms in its territory.” 282 At the same time, the negotiating side for the EU, after the “failure” of Cancún, seems to have made a shift in orientation: 280 Speech by Commissioner Pascal Lamy to the United Nations, October 31, 2003 “IS THERE LIFE AFTER CANCUN?”. 281 http://www.bbc.co.uk/portuguese/economia/story/2003/09/030911_casssuca2mp.shtml. 282 EU: DG Trade: http://europa.eu.int/comm/trade/issues/sectoral/investment/conswtoag_inv.htm.
“As far as the EU is concerned, it is suggested that we now be ready to explore alternative approaches to negotiating the Singapore issues of investment, competition, trade facilitation and transparency in government procurement, possibly through removing them from the single undertaking of the negotiations and through negotiating them as plurilateral agreements if necessary. While maintaining our substantive objects, it also suggests a slight adjustment of the approach on trade and environment and geographical indications aimed at reducing reticence to negotiations in these areas.” 283 The EU ambassador to the WTO in Geneva, Carlos Trojan, has praised the EU –proposal, to take the “Singapore issues” out of the single undertaking, as a “major shift” of EU-policy. 284 Nevertheless, it seems apparent, that Brussels does not want to take the Singapore-issues completely out of the negotiation agenda, but that it is looking for “alternative approaches” within the negotiating process. If they are taken out of the single undertaking now, the EU-Commission can still put them on the agenda later or on a bilateral level. –And the investment issue is extremely urgent for the EU, which is completely in the interest of the rights and profit margins of European corporations. 283 Communication from the Commission to the Council, to the European Parliament, and to the Economic and Social Committee: Reviving the DDA Negotiations - the EU Perspective, Brussels, November 26, 2003, p. 2. 284 See Alexandra Strickner (TIP/IATP Geneva): Trade Talks remain stalled as major powers show no flexibility. Trade negotiating bodies to be reestablished early next year, December 18, 2003. 97
Page 2 and 3:
Christian Russau Enforcement of int
Page 4 and 5:
Preface Since the end of 1999 the C
Page 6 and 7:
If the “Interregional Association
Page 8 and 9:
8 Chapter 5: The enforcement of int
Page 10 and 11:
10 1.1 Negotiations of the “Inter
Page 12 and 13:
12 A similar agreement of the so-ca
Page 14 and 15:
14 tute in the eyes of many countri
Page 16 and 17:
16 amaraty, where the FTAA-negotiat
Page 18 and 19:
18 free trade agreement between the
Page 20 and 21:
20 at the UN Millenium Summit to ha
Page 22 and 23:
22 on the possibility of a unilater
Page 24 and 25:
24 tual contradictions between the
Page 26 and 27:
26 fired. The workers union OGB-L,
Page 28 and 29:
28 policy and EU development policy
Page 31 and 32:
Chapter 2: Foreign direct investmen
Page 33 and 34:
50% in 2002 as compared to the prev
Page 35 and 36:
The reasons for propagating this co
Page 37 and 38:
• according to a study conducted
Page 39 and 40:
promotion of domestic demand, in or
Page 41 and 42:
2.2 International Agreements and Tr
Page 43 and 44:
2.3 The World Trade Organization WT
Page 45 and 46: • trade and investment • compet
Page 47 and 48: 2.3.3 The GATS agreement The Genera
Page 49 and 50: which works on a profit-basis, sees
Page 51 and 52: “deadline: by 1 January 2005”.
Page 53 and 54: “discrimination” or “expropri
Page 55: Stockholm Chamber of Commerce (SCC)
Page 58 and 59: 58 3.1 European foreign investment
Page 60 and 61: 60 zations and liberalization in La
Page 62 and 63: 62 the profitability, on the electr
Page 64 and 65: 64 America. Also the issue of human
Page 66 and 67: 66 • Thirdly the WTO Dispute Sett
Page 68 and 69: 68 to the U.S. trade power by rapid
Page 70 and 71: 70 The largest trade balance defici
Page 72 and 73: 72 OECD area by European companies.
Page 74 and 75: 74 EDF, has issued a similar compla
Page 76 and 77: 76 European automobile producers in
Page 78 and 79: 78 But not only international law o
Page 80 and 81: 80 ment,” which in the beginning
Page 82 and 83: 82 4. 1 The free trade agreement be
Page 84 and 85: 84 issues for us.” 233 On the oth
Page 86 and 87: 86 capital flows” explicitly. The
Page 88 and 89: 88 which also speaks out against th
Page 90 and 91: 90 in Congress and encouraged the B
Page 92 and 93: 92 studies in 2003 on the impact of
Page 94 and 95: 94 The MEBF successfully works as a
Page 98 and 99: 98 4.2 The example of Brazil: Forei
Page 100 and 101: 100 Brazilian Constitution. This wo
Page 102 and 103: 102 countries through CC-5 accounts
Page 104 and 105: 104 4.3 Brazil, foreign direct inve
Page 106 and 107: 106 “Commercial Presence: The jur
Page 108 and 109: 108 Providing cheaper access to wat
Page 110 and 111: 110
Page 112 and 113: 112 5.1 Foreign direct investment i
Page 114 and 115: 114 The agreement on government pro
Page 116 and 117: 116 5.2 The case of Chile: Foreign
Page 118 and 119: 118 which was believed to be dead,
Page 120 and 121: 120 c) The still pending Doha “De
Page 122 and 123: 122 gesamtamerikanischen Freihandel
Page 124 and 125: 124 · http://europa.eu.int/comm/co
Page 126 and 127: 126 · http://www.citizen.org/ · h
Page 128 and 129: 128 · http://www.rebrip.org.br ·
Page 130 and 131: 130 um den Markt der wiederentdeckt
Page 132 and 133: 132 · Torrent, Ramón: Acordos Int
Page 134 and 135: 134 DIHK Deutscher Industrie- und H
Page 136 and 137: 136 Lomé Lomé-Agreement between E
Page 138 and 139: About FDCL is a nonprofitorganizati
show all

(EU) and the Common Market of the South (MERCOSUR)? - FDCL

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?