National Amphetamine-Type Stimulant Strategy Background Paper
National Amphetamine-Type Stimulant Strategy Background Paper
National Amphetamine-Type Stimulant Strategy Background Paper
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
113<br />
The APS, and other submissions, particularly emphasized the need for more coordinated<br />
and collaborative responses among services. This included improving pathways between<br />
services, establishing effective referral systems and a unified case management approach.<br />
In their submission, Headspace not only emphasized the need to ensure a coordinated<br />
approach, but noted the need to facilitate multiple entry points into care:<br />
the strategy should emphasise an integrated and coordinated service response between<br />
mental health services, AOD services, general welfare and youth services and dual<br />
diagnosis services. There should be ‘no wrong door’ for ATS users who are seeking<br />
information, support and treatment.<br />
5.10 Summary<br />
Treatment for ATS use and associated problems is impeded by relatively low rates of<br />
access by ATS users and tenuous links with services. Research suggests that those least<br />
likely to receive treatment are females, persons born outside Australia and those in fulltime<br />
employment. Furthermore, poor treatment retention is associated with frequent use,<br />
injecting and use during treatment. Nevertheless, recent Australian national data suggest<br />
that approximately 11% of those seeking treatment for drug use reported amphetamine<br />
as the principal drug of concern. Of this group, the most common form of treatment was<br />
counselling.<br />
The first point of contact for many ATS users is with frontline services, often due to<br />
intoxication or related problems including violence and psychotic behaviours. The high<br />
burden on frontline services posed by ATS use, particularly methamphetamine, is largely<br />
due to the nature of the presentations rather than the actual numbers of ATS-related<br />
presentations. As a result, national guidelines have been developed for police, ambulance<br />
staff, emergency departments and general practitioners in managing psychostimulant<br />
users, including pharmacological management of toxicity. The extent of dissemination and<br />
utilisation of these guidelines remains unclear.<br />
A related issue is that of withdrawal management for ATS. Current research suggests the<br />
amphetamine withdrawal syndrome is comprised of hyperarousal symptoms, reversed<br />
vegetative symptoms and anxiety-related symptoms. Symptoms of depression have also<br />
been found during the first several days of withdrawal. At present there appears to be a lack<br />
of clear protocols for appropriate withdrawal management for dependent meth/amphetamine<br />
users. Pharmacotherapies currently being trialled include various antidepressants,<br />
mirtazepine and modafinil.<br />
Several psychosocial interventions have been used in treatment for ATS users. These<br />
include brief interventions, inpatient programs, therapeutic communities, 12-step programs,<br />
peer interventions, contingency management, behavioural strategies, cognitive-behavioural<br />
interventions, multimodal packages (such as the Matrix Model used in the United States)<br />
and non-traditional methods such as acupuncture. Research to date suggests that cognitive<br />
behavioural therapy (CBT) applied in a stepped care approach is the treatment of best<br />
practice for ATS use. CBT is typically comprised of motivational interviewing, instruction in<br />
cognitive-behavioural coping strategies and relapse prevention. However, there is a limited<br />
evidence base and consideration of what is best practice may be confirmed or change