National Amphetamine-Type Stimulant Strategy Background Paper
National Amphetamine-Type Stimulant Strategy Background Paper
National Amphetamine-Type Stimulant Strategy Background Paper
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
26<br />
this survey is conducted with the general population, the Australian Secondary Students’<br />
Alcohol and Drug (ASSAD) Survey reports the use of over-the-counter and illicit drugs<br />
among students aged 12 to 17 years attending grades 7 to 12 across Australia.<br />
The 2005 ASSAD found that the vast majority (95%) of secondary school students had<br />
never used amphetamine (White & Hayman, 2006). By the age of 17, 7% of students<br />
reported some experience with amphetamine and approximately 3% of students 14<br />
years and over reported using amphetamine in the month before the survey. Of the 4% of<br />
students who used amphetamine in the year before the survey, 39% of males and 48% of<br />
females indicated that they had used them once or twice. While there was no change in<br />
the proportion of 12 to15 year-olds or 16 to17 year-olds using amphetamine in their lifetime<br />
between 2002 and 2005, there was a significant decrease between 1999 and 2005 for both<br />
age groups. However, there was no change in the proportion of students in both age groups<br />
using amphetamine in the month prior to the survey between 1996 and 2005. Only 4% of<br />
students had ever used ecstasy and recent use was not common among any age group.<br />
2% of students aged 16 to17 had used ecstasy in the month prior to the survey.<br />
Results from the 2005 ASSAD Survey also indicate that poly-drug use is frequent among<br />
secondary students aged 12 to 17 years. Students who had used cannabis, amphetamine,<br />
hallucinogens or ecstasy reported on other drugs used concurrently. Between 53% and<br />
68% used alcohol concurrently with these four drugs and between 41% and 48% used<br />
tobacco. Over one-third of students using amphetamine, hallucinogens or ecstasy also used<br />
cannabis concurrently. One-quarter of students using hallucinogens, one-fifth of students<br />
using cannabis, 18% of students using amphetamine and 17% using ecstasy did not use<br />
any other substance.<br />
In their submission, the Youth Substance Abuse Service (YSAS) in Victoria reported on an<br />
analysis of the primary drug of choice being used by young people presenting over the past<br />
five years. Results demonstrate that presentations for heroin use dropped markedly, while<br />
there were corresponding increases in cannabis, alcohol, and ATS use during this period.<br />
This submission reported that presentations for heroin treatment decreased from 48% in<br />
2001-02 to 19% in 2005-06, while presentations for ATS increased from 7% in 2001-02 to<br />
8.5% in 2005-06. These findings are contrary to those reported by the Ted Noffs Foundation<br />
(TNF) (see www.noffs.org.au/programs/palm.shtm). TNF provides youth-specific programs<br />
including Adolescent Drug Withdrawal Unit (ADWU), which is a 2-week residential program<br />
for withdrawal and longer residential treatment in the rehabilitation program called Program<br />
for Adolescent Life Management (PALM). PALM is designed for 14 to 18 year olds with<br />
serious alcohol, or other drug-related difficulties. Research found that 21.8% of admissions<br />
in 2001 nominated ATS as their primary drug of concern, compared with 41.7% in 2004.<br />
This was higher than for heroin, and second only to cannabis. Further, it also found that,<br />
between 2001 and 2006, a sample of 566 clients with ATS as the primary or secondary drug<br />
of concern were more likely to be female, have injected any drug, had suicidal thoughts in<br />
the last 3 months, had made a suicide attempt, reported self harm and scored higher on<br />
depression, anxiety, hostility, paranoia and psychoticism on the Brief Symptom Inventory<br />
(BSI). These users were also more likely to have lived in more places in the six months prior<br />
to treatment entry, were more likely to have been sexually and physically assaulted by a<br />
stranger or by a known person, been violent and aggressive as a consequence of their drug<br />
use, and been involved in a greater variety of crime.