08.01.2014 Views

National Amphetamine-Type Stimulant Strategy Background Paper

National Amphetamine-Type Stimulant Strategy Background Paper

National Amphetamine-Type Stimulant Strategy Background Paper

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

42<br />

In 2005, there was a total of 68 drug induced deaths in which methamphetamine was<br />

mentioned among those aged 15 to 54 years, compared to 75 in 2004 (Degenhardt &<br />

Roxburgh, 2007). Of these deaths, methamphetamine was found to be the underlying<br />

cause in 26 cases in 2005 compared to 17 in 2004. Deaths from ecstasy consumption have<br />

variously involved persons with pre-existing cardiac conditions (World Health Organisation,<br />

1997), hyperthermia, and ingestion of excessive amounts of water (Darke et al., 2000).<br />

Deaths following MDMA use are frequently the consequence of a serotonin syndrome and/<br />

or of sympathomimetic overstimulation, both of which are exacerbated by environmentally<br />

caused overheating (Schifano, 2003).<br />

A study conducted by Schifano and colleagues (2003) investigated the number of ecstasyrelated<br />

deaths occurring in England and Wales between August 1996 and April 2002<br />

recorded in the <strong>National</strong> Programme on Substance Abuse Deaths database. A total of<br />

202 ecstasy-related deaths were recorded and showed a steady increase in the number<br />

of deaths each year. Of these, ecstasy was implicated as the sole drug causing death in<br />

only 17% of cases, with a variety of other drugs (mostly alcohol, cocaine, amphetamine<br />

and opiates) being identified. Toxicology results revealed MDMA accounted for 86% of<br />

cases, MDA for 13% of cases, and single deaths were associated with MDEA and PMA.<br />

An analysis of ecstasy-related deaths in Australia during 2000-2004 using data from the<br />

<strong>National</strong> Coronial Information System (NCIS) found 112 such deaths (Fowler et al., in<br />

press). Ecstasy was deemed to be the primary contributory factor in just under half of these<br />

cases, and the sole drug present in only six of these deaths (Fowler et al., in press).<br />

Negative effects of specific routes of administration<br />

Some effects are associated with specific routes of administration, as detailed at the<br />

<strong>National</strong> Leadership Forum on Ice (Ministerial Council of Drug <strong>Strategy</strong> Joint Communiqué,<br />

2007). Nasal use by snorting has a delayed effect of approximately five minutes subsequent<br />

to dose. There is a potential risk for Hepatitis C to be passed on from tiny, often invisible<br />

amounts of blood on shared snorting equipment. Oral use of crystal methamphetamine by<br />

swallowing can cause irritation as crystal particles travel to the stomach. Anal and vaginal<br />

use, known as ‘shelving’ and ‘shafting’, can damage the lining of the anus or vagina and<br />

increase the chances of HIV and Hepatitis C transmission. In addition to the typical health<br />

and medical effects associated with smoking including addiction, smoking equipment<br />

can cause burns to mouth or gums, and Hepatitis C can be transmitted if equipment is<br />

shared. In addition to smoking, injecting is the route of administration most associated with<br />

dependence, and the latter mode of administration poses risks of contracting blood borne<br />

viruses, and repeated injection in the same spot can lead to vein inflammation, scarring,<br />

abscesses, blood clots and vein collapse.<br />

There is a paucity of research investigating transitions to injecting from other routes of<br />

administration. Those studies that have investigated this area have mostly recruited heroin<br />

users (e.g., Gossop et al., 1988; Neaigus et al., 2001; Parker et al., 1988). A paper by<br />

Strang and colleagues (1992) identified the pertinent issues, including variations of route<br />

of administration by time and place; influence of availability of drug paraphernalia; influence<br />

of context; and the association between changes in route of one drug and changes in route<br />

of other drugs.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!