National Amphetamine-Type Stimulant Strategy Background Paper
National Amphetamine-Type Stimulant Strategy Background Paper
National Amphetamine-Type Stimulant Strategy Background Paper
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
136<br />
Rehabilitation in Corrections<br />
The adult prison population in Australia is increasing. Data from the Australian Bureau of<br />
Statistics – 2006 Prisoners in Australia (Trewin, 2006b), show an increase of 42% from<br />
18,193 in 1996 to 25,790 in 2006. According to the Australian Institute of Criminology<br />
(2007a), 60% of prisoners in 2006 were known to be in prison previously. The median age<br />
of prisoners is 33, with most prisoners (70%) aged between 20-39 years.<br />
According to the 2006 Prisoners in Australia (Trewin, 2006b), of those sentenced for illicit drug<br />
offences in 2006, 5% were sentenced to fewer than 12 months, 12% to between two and five<br />
years and 14% between five and ten years. The New South Wales Justice Health Service<br />
(2005) reports that about 80% of people in custody have committed drug related crimes. By<br />
comparison with the other purposes of prison such as acting as a deterrent to further offending<br />
or as punishment, the capacity of corrections to effect rehabilitation is very dependent on the<br />
lengths of prison sentences and the rehabilitation programs available to them.<br />
Black, Dolan and Wodak (2004) undertook a study of supply, demand and reduction<br />
strategies in Australian prisons. The authors commented on the absence of information<br />
about the effectiveness of some strategies, the long term consequences of these strategies<br />
in terms of benefits and adverse consequences, and their costs. The study found, for<br />
example, that supply reduction strategies which include drug detection dogs and urinalysis<br />
are yet to be evaluated in terms of overall benefits, value and cost. The study identified<br />
favourable outcomes for some demand reduction strategies including detoxification,<br />
methadone treatment, inmate programs and counselling, and drug-free units but found that<br />
the availability of these services was insufficient. There was also evidence of insufficient<br />
implementation of relatively inexpensive harm reduction strategies such as education,<br />
peer education, blood-borne viral infection (BBVI) testing, hepatitis B vaccination, condom<br />
provision, bleach/detergent provision, naloxone provision and needle and syringe programs<br />
despite favourable evaluations and their relatively low cost of implementation.<br />
In 2006, a draft <strong>National</strong> Corrections Drug <strong>Strategy</strong> 2006-2009 was developed to<br />
complement the <strong>National</strong> Drug <strong>Strategy</strong>. It identified six principles for consideration by<br />
jurisdictions. These include:<br />
• Achieve an appropriate balance between the priority areas of supply reduction, demand<br />
reduction and harm reduction;<br />
• Provide services to a level equal to those provided in the wider community;<br />
• Support the specific needs of Indigenous people;<br />
• Use evidence based good practice examples;<br />
• Establish partnerships across relevant agencies and support organisations; and<br />
• Provide a continuity of care throughout the period of sentencing and beyond.