Publication 91 - Confirmation Services Technical Guide
Publication 91 - Confirmation Services Technical Guide
Publication 91 - Confirmation Services Technical Guide
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Confirmation</strong> <strong>Services</strong> <strong>Technical</strong> <strong>Guide</strong><br />
TOPICS<br />
BARCODES<br />
I’ve been told by the Postal Service<br />
that my barcodes are not placed properly<br />
on the packages.<br />
GUIDELINES<br />
Label Placement. It is important to ensure that the confirmation services<br />
barcode is on the same side and in close proximity to the recipient’s<br />
address. When this does not occur, it is very possible a delivery<br />
employee will not notice the barcode on another side of the package,<br />
resulting in a missed scan. This occurs most often with smaller<br />
packages, if the barcode is wrapped around the side of the box on a<br />
different side from the recipient’s address.<br />
This happens more often with shipping partners, whose customers place<br />
their customers’ address labels on the packages before forwarding the<br />
packages to their consolidators. The shipping partners then place the<br />
Delivery <strong>Confirmation</strong> service label on the package. This is a training<br />
issue that the shipping partner needs to address with its shipping<br />
department personnel.<br />
Overlabeling. Ensure that the confirmation service barcode is not<br />
covered by other barcodes or labels. When this occurs, the delivery<br />
employees cannot scan the barcode or key in the PIC unless the entire<br />
PIC is visible. Labels may be placed over the confirmation services<br />
barcode due to the lack of understanding by the shipping department<br />
personnel on the importance of the delivery information to their company.<br />
The company, in this case, should work with their personnel to ensure<br />
that no other barcodes are in the vicinity of the confirmation service<br />
barcode or that the confirmation service barcode is obscured in any<br />
way.<br />
64 <strong>Publication</strong> <strong>91</strong>, September 2002