Council Minutes 21 January 2008 - Waratah-Wynyard Council
Council Minutes 21 January 2008 - Waratah-Wynyard Council
Council Minutes 21 January 2008 - Waratah-Wynyard Council
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Planning Authority Reports<br />
Chris and Bev Banks<br />
Issue Raised:<br />
The representors bought land at the rear of their lot that was previously part<br />
of the subject site when a previous subdivision design was proposed. As part<br />
of the previous design, the representors would have had street access to the<br />
rear of their lot. Concerned that the new subdivision design does not provide<br />
street access to the rear of the representor’s lot. Representors made the<br />
purchase of the rear land on the advice of <strong>Council</strong> staff.<br />
Representors provides the following solution to the issue:<br />
- Proposed Lot 1 be limited in size by extending the proposed road reserve to<br />
the boundary of their property where the driveway access point is located.<br />
Planning Comment:<br />
It appears that the representors purchased the parcel of land at the rear of their<br />
lot on the basis of a previous, approved subdivision design. The previous<br />
subdivision design was such that a road connection could be provided to the<br />
rear of both the representor’s and neighbours lots. There was never any<br />
guarantee that the proponents of the previous subdivision would proceed with<br />
it and the representors speculated on the purchase. The current design is<br />
considered to provide appropriate road connections and there is no<br />
requirement for the developer to provide a connection to the rear of number<br />
143 and 145 Inglis Street. If this subdivision is approved, there is still no<br />
guarantee that it will proceed.<br />
With respect to the recommended design change, <strong>Council</strong> must consider that<br />
application as submitted. There are not sufficient, valid grounds to warrant a<br />
condition requiring the design to be altered.<br />
Chris and Bev Banks<br />
Issue Raised:<br />
With the exception of the issue raised above, the representor supports the<br />
subdivision but would like to see more environmentally friendly features<br />
incorporated.<br />
Planning Comment:<br />
It is noted that the representors support the subdivision. The subdivision is<br />
assessed on the merits in accordance with the Planning Scheme requirements.<br />
Future developments may incorporate environmentally friendly features<br />
however, the Planning Scheme standards do not mandate the inclusion of such<br />
features.<br />
<strong>Waratah</strong>-<strong>Wynyard</strong> <strong>Council</strong> – Ordinary Meeting <strong>Minutes</strong> – <strong>21</strong> <strong>January</strong> <strong>2008</strong> Page 49