02.02.2014 Views

Council Minutes 21 January 2008 - Waratah-Wynyard Council

Council Minutes 21 January 2008 - Waratah-Wynyard Council

Council Minutes 21 January 2008 - Waratah-Wynyard Council

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Planning Authority Reports<br />

Chris and Bev Banks<br />

Issue Raised:<br />

The representors bought land at the rear of their lot that was previously part<br />

of the subject site when a previous subdivision design was proposed. As part<br />

of the previous design, the representors would have had street access to the<br />

rear of their lot. Concerned that the new subdivision design does not provide<br />

street access to the rear of the representor’s lot. Representors made the<br />

purchase of the rear land on the advice of <strong>Council</strong> staff.<br />

Representors provides the following solution to the issue:<br />

- Proposed Lot 1 be limited in size by extending the proposed road reserve to<br />

the boundary of their property where the driveway access point is located.<br />

Planning Comment:<br />

It appears that the representors purchased the parcel of land at the rear of their<br />

lot on the basis of a previous, approved subdivision design. The previous<br />

subdivision design was such that a road connection could be provided to the<br />

rear of both the representor’s and neighbours lots. There was never any<br />

guarantee that the proponents of the previous subdivision would proceed with<br />

it and the representors speculated on the purchase. The current design is<br />

considered to provide appropriate road connections and there is no<br />

requirement for the developer to provide a connection to the rear of number<br />

143 and 145 Inglis Street. If this subdivision is approved, there is still no<br />

guarantee that it will proceed.<br />

With respect to the recommended design change, <strong>Council</strong> must consider that<br />

application as submitted. There are not sufficient, valid grounds to warrant a<br />

condition requiring the design to be altered.<br />

Chris and Bev Banks<br />

Issue Raised:<br />

With the exception of the issue raised above, the representor supports the<br />

subdivision but would like to see more environmentally friendly features<br />

incorporated.<br />

Planning Comment:<br />

It is noted that the representors support the subdivision. The subdivision is<br />

assessed on the merits in accordance with the Planning Scheme requirements.<br />

Future developments may incorporate environmentally friendly features<br />

however, the Planning Scheme standards do not mandate the inclusion of such<br />

features.<br />

<strong>Waratah</strong>-<strong>Wynyard</strong> <strong>Council</strong> – Ordinary Meeting <strong>Minutes</strong> – <strong>21</strong> <strong>January</strong> <strong>2008</strong> Page 49

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!