Alma Mater Studiorum Universit`a degli Studi di Bologna ... - Inaf
Alma Mater Studiorum Universit`a degli Studi di Bologna ... - Inaf
Alma Mater Studiorum Universit`a degli Studi di Bologna ... - Inaf
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
3.1. Introduction 23<br />
Figure 3.1: Example of a relic. Left: Westerbork Synthesis Ra<strong>di</strong>o Telescope (WSRT) image at<br />
1.4 GHz overlaid on the X-ray emission from ROSAT showing the hot ICM (red contours). Right:<br />
Polarization electric field vectors at 4.9 GHz (corrected for the effects of Faraday rotation) and<br />
with lengths proportional to the fractional polarization at the same frequency. A reference vector<br />
for 100% polarization is drawn in the top left corner. Both figures are taken from van Weeren et<br />
al. (2010).<br />
(e.g. Giovannini & Feretti 2002; Clarke & Enßlin 2006; Giacintucci et al. 2009. Both ra<strong>di</strong>o halos<br />
and relics show steep ra<strong>di</strong>o spectra (α≥1) and low surface brightness (∼ 10 −6 Jy arcsec −2 at<br />
1.4 GHz).<br />
The most widely accepted scenario for the origin of ra<strong>di</strong>o relics is that (primary) relativistic<br />
electrons are injected into the ICM from AGN activity and/or from star formation in galaxies. They<br />
are then accelerated by shocks or mergers (Enßlin et al. 1998; Röttiger, Burns & Stone 1999) or<br />
by a<strong>di</strong>abatic compression of fossil ra<strong>di</strong>o plasma (Ensslin & Gopal-Krishna 2001). This picture is<br />
supported by the typical high degree of polarization and the orientation of magnetic field vectors,<br />
which appear to be oriented along the major axis of elongated relics with coherence scales of<br />
several hundreds of kpc (Right panel of Fig. 3.1). Indeed, compression and/or shocks can locally<br />
amplify and align the field with their surfaces.<br />
In contrast, the formation of ra<strong>di</strong>o halos is still debated. Since primary relativistic electrons<br />
lose energy on short timescales (∼ 10 7−8 yrs), they cannot <strong>di</strong>ffuse any significant <strong>di</strong>stance in<br />
the cluster before ceasing to ra<strong>di</strong>ate. To explain the large extension, up to Mpc scales, of ra<strong>di</strong>o<br />
halos, continuous injection processes and/or particle re-acceleration are required. These might<br />
be due to gas turbulence, efficient in energetic mergers (primary models). Another possibility<br />
is that secondary electrons are continuously injected in the ICM by hadronic collisions between<br />
relativistic protons and ICM thermal protons (secondary models). Because of their higher mass,<br />
23