06.03.2014 Views

Alma Mater Studiorum Universit`a degli Studi di Bologna ... - Inaf

Alma Mater Studiorum Universit`a degli Studi di Bologna ... - Inaf

Alma Mater Studiorum Universit`a degli Studi di Bologna ... - Inaf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

3.2. Faraday Rotation 29<br />

Figure 3.4: RM (corrected for the Galactic contribution) plotted as a function of source impact<br />

parameter in kpc for a sample of Abell clusters. The ra<strong>di</strong>o galaxies are split into clusters members<br />

(red), background (blue) sources and sources whose line-of-sight does not intercept the clusters<br />

X-ray emission (black). Taken from Clarke (2004).<br />

magnetic field internal to the ra<strong>di</strong>o galaxies into the surroun<strong>di</strong>ng thermal gas with the consequent<br />

creation of a local Faraday screen. This model pre<strong>di</strong>cts magnetic field reversals and depolarization<br />

of emission from the surface layer.<br />

Arguments in favour of an origin of the observed RM in the IGM of the ra<strong>di</strong>o source (item 2)<br />

are as follows.<br />

• The detection of <strong>di</strong>ffuse synchrotron emission in galaxy clusters (Sec. 3.1.1), implies that<br />

the IGM must be magnetized, so Faraday rotation is inevitable.<br />

• The more <strong>di</strong>stant ra<strong>di</strong>o lobe of a source shows higher depolarization than the approaching<br />

one (the Laing-Garrington effect; Laing 1988; Garrington et al. 1988). This is interpreted<br />

as resulting from a <strong>di</strong>fference in the path length, and hence the Faraday depth, for the two<br />

lobes. Such an effect is not expected for a skin model (item 1) since in this case there is no<br />

reason for <strong>di</strong>fferent path lengths between the two lobes.<br />

• A statistical comparison of the RM’s of point sources behind, embedded in and away from<br />

foreground galaxy clusters (Clarke 2004) has shown that those located behind clusters have<br />

a large RM <strong>di</strong>spersion (Fig. 3.4).<br />

• Very large RM values are observed in cool core clusters.<br />

• The <strong>di</strong>spersion in RM observed across in<strong>di</strong>vidual sources is not correlated with Galactic<br />

coor<strong>di</strong>nates, implying that the Galactic contribution is not dominant on small scales<br />

(although it will influence the mean).<br />

29

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!