Alma Mater Studiorum Universit`a degli Studi di Bologna ... - Inaf
Alma Mater Studiorum Universit`a degli Studi di Bologna ... - Inaf
Alma Mater Studiorum Universit`a degli Studi di Bologna ... - Inaf
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
3.2. Faraday Rotation 29<br />
Figure 3.4: RM (corrected for the Galactic contribution) plotted as a function of source impact<br />
parameter in kpc for a sample of Abell clusters. The ra<strong>di</strong>o galaxies are split into clusters members<br />
(red), background (blue) sources and sources whose line-of-sight does not intercept the clusters<br />
X-ray emission (black). Taken from Clarke (2004).<br />
magnetic field internal to the ra<strong>di</strong>o galaxies into the surroun<strong>di</strong>ng thermal gas with the consequent<br />
creation of a local Faraday screen. This model pre<strong>di</strong>cts magnetic field reversals and depolarization<br />
of emission from the surface layer.<br />
Arguments in favour of an origin of the observed RM in the IGM of the ra<strong>di</strong>o source (item 2)<br />
are as follows.<br />
• The detection of <strong>di</strong>ffuse synchrotron emission in galaxy clusters (Sec. 3.1.1), implies that<br />
the IGM must be magnetized, so Faraday rotation is inevitable.<br />
• The more <strong>di</strong>stant ra<strong>di</strong>o lobe of a source shows higher depolarization than the approaching<br />
one (the Laing-Garrington effect; Laing 1988; Garrington et al. 1988). This is interpreted<br />
as resulting from a <strong>di</strong>fference in the path length, and hence the Faraday depth, for the two<br />
lobes. Such an effect is not expected for a skin model (item 1) since in this case there is no<br />
reason for <strong>di</strong>fferent path lengths between the two lobes.<br />
• A statistical comparison of the RM’s of point sources behind, embedded in and away from<br />
foreground galaxy clusters (Clarke 2004) has shown that those located behind clusters have<br />
a large RM <strong>di</strong>spersion (Fig. 3.4).<br />
• Very large RM values are observed in cool core clusters.<br />
• The <strong>di</strong>spersion in RM observed across in<strong>di</strong>vidual sources is not correlated with Galactic<br />
coor<strong>di</strong>nates, implying that the Galactic contribution is not dominant on small scales<br />
(although it will influence the mean).<br />
29