06.03.2014 Views

Alma Mater Studiorum Universit`a degli Studi di Bologna ... - Inaf

Alma Mater Studiorum Universit`a degli Studi di Bologna ... - Inaf

Alma Mater Studiorum Universit`a degli Studi di Bologna ... - Inaf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

66 4. The magneto-ionic me<strong>di</strong>um around 3C 449<br />

(a)<br />

(c)<br />

(b)<br />

(d)<br />

Figure 4.11: Comparison between observed and synthetic profiles of rms and mean Faraday<br />

rotation at resolutions of 5.5 arcsec (a and b) and 1.25 arcsec (c and d). The synthetic profiles<br />

are derived from the best-fitting model withΛ max = 65 kpc. The black points represent the data<br />

with vertical bars correspon<strong>di</strong>ng to the rms fitting error. (a) and (c): Profiles ofσ RM . The magenta<br />

crosses represent the mean values from 35 simulations at 5.5-arcsec resolution, and the vertical<br />

bars are the rms scatter in these profiles due to sampling. (b) and (d): Profiles of〈RM〉 derived<br />

from single example realizations at 5.5 and 1.25-arcsec resolutions.<br />

scale. The model withΛ max =65 kpc gives the best representation of the data. The fit is within<br />

the estimated errors except for a marginal <strong>di</strong>screpancy at the very largest (and therefore poorly<br />

sampled) separations. That withΛ max =20 kpc is inconsistent with the observed pseudo-structure<br />

function for any separation> ∼ 20 arcsec (≃6 kpc) where the sampling is still very good, and is firmly<br />

excluded. The model withΛ max =205 kpc has slightly, but significantly too much power on large<br />

scales.<br />

I emphasize that such estimate of the outer scale of the RM fluctuations is essentially<br />

independent of the functional form assumed for the variation of field strength with ra<strong>di</strong>us in the<br />

central region, which affects the structure function only for small separations. The results are<br />

almost identical if I fit the field-strength variation with either the profile of Eq. 4.5 (withη≈0) or<br />

that of Eq. 4.6.<br />

As for the structure functions of in<strong>di</strong>vidual regions, the pseudo-structure function at large<br />

66

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!