Proceedings 2002/2003 - IRSE
Proceedings 2002/2003 - IRSE
Proceedings 2002/2003 - IRSE
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
130<br />
SCOTTISH SECTION<br />
He drew comparisons from his experience of Health<br />
& Safety management in other industry sectors,<br />
which gave background to some of the changes in<br />
the approach. He explained how improvements had<br />
been made in liaison and protocol between the<br />
HMRI, Police, Train Operating Companies,<br />
Infrastructure Controller and other affected<br />
organisations after accidents occur. (Attendees 30)<br />
Two lectures were held in February. Firstly, Liam<br />
Regan, of Thales, presented “Delivering Telecomms<br />
for the London Underground Connect Project”. In<br />
this lecture Liam outlined the communications<br />
strategy for this project and went on to describe the<br />
transmission and copper cable installation methods<br />
used to interconnect the various major operational<br />
centres on the Underground. He also described the<br />
Private Finance Initiative strategy and the minimum<br />
service levels specified for this telecomms infrastructure.<br />
(Attendees 13)<br />
Our other February lecture was held jointly with<br />
the IMechE (Railway Division) at Caledonian<br />
University. Mike Corbett, TPWS (Trainborne) Project<br />
Director, Joint ROSCO Working Group, presented<br />
the trainborne aspects of TPWS installation. This<br />
was of particular interest to all who have been<br />
involved in the provision of TPWS. Mike very helpfully<br />
introduced the topic by explaining the history<br />
up to the implementation of TPWS and went on to<br />
describe the activities of the Joint ROSCO Working<br />
Group. He also explained details of the trainborne<br />
equipment, the implementation strategy, various<br />
‘interface’ issues (and some teething problems)<br />
along with some lessons learned.<br />
In March John Bryant, of Bentley Systems,<br />
presented “The Unified Railway Model”. This lecture<br />
incorporated a presentation on the use of virtual<br />
reality within the railway environment. A desktop<br />
signal sighting exercise was simulated where signals<br />
could be ‘placed’ at various possible locations to<br />
assess visibility. The software also has the capability<br />
to calculate the distance/time that the signal is<br />
visible to the driver. Attendees were impressed by<br />
the realism of the 3D images and the powerful<br />
impact this facility could have on assessing<br />
proposed alterations to infrastructure before<br />
construction. (Attendees 10)<br />
In a departure form normal tradition, our AGM was<br />
held in April and for the first time, combined with a<br />
quiz night in less formal (and licensed) surroundings.<br />
Some of us discovered just how wide the gaps in our<br />
knowledge were during the signal engineering round<br />
of questions! However, the evening was a great<br />
success and enjoyed by all. For the session <strong>2003</strong>/<br />
2004, the Section intends to continue using the<br />
premises of Glasgow Caledonian University for most<br />
meetings.<br />
Alan King<br />
Secretary<br />
Southern African Section<br />
MEMBERSHIP<br />
At the end of the <strong>2002</strong> session, the membership of<br />
the Southern African Section stood at 51. This was<br />
made up as follows:<br />
Companion 1<br />
Fellow 9<br />
Member 27<br />
Associate Member 5<br />
Accredited Technician 9<br />
The membership per country within the Southern<br />
African Section is:<br />
South Africa 47<br />
Zimbabwe 4<br />
OFFICERS FOR THE 2001 SESSION<br />
Chairman<br />
Dr Bennie Steyn<br />
Vice-Chairman<br />
Rod Kohler<br />
Secretary<br />
Vic Bowles<br />
Treasurer<br />
Johan van de Pol<br />
Committee Members<br />
Derrick Marais<br />
Graham Paverd, Phil Meyer,<br />
Craig Mathys<br />
Co-opted Member<br />
Bob Woodhead<br />
FUNCTIONS<br />
On 14th February <strong>2002</strong> the Chairman led a<br />
discussion addressing “Communication Based<br />
Signalling”. As background to this discussion it was<br />
recognised that ETCS has received a lot of attention<br />
in Europe and an enormous amount of money is<br />
being spent on the development of the requirements<br />
for different levels. The testing and evaluation of the<br />
concepts are well on the way and implementation is<br />
expected soon. In the UK, a huge amount of money<br />
is being spent on CBS for the West Coast Mainline<br />
and the installation of TPWS. In the USA, on the<br />
other hand, the most notable effort is that of the<br />
NYCT with the development of the so-called<br />
Communication Based Control system. The above<br />
developments are earmarked for lines with extensive<br />
passenger traffic. The major freight railways are<br />
looking at the implementation of add-on systems<br />
such as warning systems (EPWS) and Positive Train<br />
Separation systems (PTS), which would improve the<br />
safety of existing, line side systems.<br />
In South Africa we have pioneered very cost<br />
effective lineside signalling systems including hybrid<br />
interlocking, points and remote control systems, to<br />
name a few. In the midst of these developments<br />
throughout the world, we in South Africa are<br />
implementing, or about to implement various forms<br />
of communication based signalling systems such as<br />
RTO, Track Warrant and CBA.<br />
The discussion concluded that the conditions in<br />
South Africa dictate that communication based<br />
signalling is destined to become the preferred<br />
technology of the future, but the currently<br />
constrained capital resource will contain the rate of<br />
implementation.