06.03.2014 Views

Proceedings 2002/2003 - IRSE

Proceedings 2002/2003 - IRSE

Proceedings 2002/2003 - IRSE

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

52<br />

SIGNALLING CONTROL CENTRES TODAY AND TOMORROW<br />

IECC uses its own real time operating system BRX<br />

(British Rail real time executive) which is specifically<br />

designed to support the networking and duplication<br />

which delivers very high system availability.<br />

To achieve predictable performance and high<br />

availability, IECC was designed around two duplicated<br />

networks, one for real time signalling data and<br />

the other for less critical information exchange. With<br />

the available technology at the time, a “register<br />

insertion ring” network architecture running at 1.5<br />

Mbits/second was chosen, because this could<br />

achieve the required data throughput with a more<br />

predictable time response than networks based on<br />

“collision and recreate-try” strategies. Interfaces<br />

between sub-systems and network nodes are 9,600<br />

baud or 19,200 baud serial links. As with the processor<br />

hardware, the network equipment has been very<br />

reliable, and the same supplier of network nodes has<br />

been used throughout. The only change has been<br />

that the nodes are now rack mounted cards in place<br />

of the original “black boxes”. The technology is now<br />

obsolete, and it is envisaged that at some time in the<br />

future there will be a move to a more modern<br />

technology such as Ethernet, with predictable time<br />

response achieved by installing a high speed<br />

network used at a small fraction of its theoretical<br />

capacity.<br />

One of the most recent innovations has been to<br />

move from EPROMs to CD-ROM as the means of<br />

configuring IECC sub-systems with software and<br />

data 2 . This has been made possible by using the<br />

latest processor boards with Electrically Erasable<br />

ROM memory. For security and to avoid installing<br />

additional hardware, the CD-ROM is read using a<br />

laptop PC, which is plugged directly into an Ethernet<br />

interface on the VME processor board when an<br />

update is required. This allows updates to take place<br />

much more rapidly and without physical disturbance<br />

to the IECC equipment.<br />

SIGNALLER’S WORKSTATION<br />

The VDU-based signaller’s workstation is the<br />

critical human interface on the operating floor of the<br />

control centre. The original design (SDS – signalling<br />

display system) typically incorporated four colour<br />

monitors built into a purpose-designed workstation<br />

cabinet, with a trackerball and keyboard for operator<br />

input. Normally two monitors provide an “overview”<br />

which allows the signaller to see all main running<br />

signals, points, track circuits and train descriptions<br />

simultaneously. A third monitor allows selection of a<br />

“close-up” view providing a more detailed view of<br />

selected areas, including details such as shunting<br />

signals and ground frames, and a fourth “general<br />

purpose VDU” provides a number of text areas for<br />

fault reporting and signaller interaction with train<br />

describer and ARS. High availability was provided<br />

for throughout the design, with a facility to switch<br />

any view to another monitor if one should fail, all<br />

critical functions accessible via both keyboard and<br />

trackerball, and duplicated processors with hot<br />

standby. Some of the later schemes incorporated<br />

more monitors (up to six) to allow very large areas of<br />

control.<br />

The workstations were well-accepted by signallers<br />

from the start, and there were few problems in<br />

adapting from panel working to VDUs. However, the<br />

monitors themselves and the VME graphics cards<br />

which provide the interface to the processors were<br />

amongst the first IECC components to become<br />

unavailable. The chosen solution to the problem was<br />

to replace these components with an industrial<br />

quality PC and monitor, linked to the main VME<br />

processors via a dedicated Ethernet link. This new<br />

system (DIS – Flexible Display System) has allowed<br />

much more choice in the size and style of monitors,<br />

and for many new installations and upgrades the<br />

customers now choose flat-screen monitors on a<br />

desktop, instead of the original fully enclosed<br />

cabinet. The old and new styles of workstation are<br />

shown in Figure 3. The move to a PC does not<br />

totally eliminate the obsolescence problem, as the<br />

PC components change on an almost monthly<br />

basis. A fast-track acceptance process has been<br />

specified to enable minor changes to PC specification<br />

to be tolerated without invalidating Railtrack’s<br />

product acceptance of the system.<br />

The colour VDU terminal providing the interface to<br />

the IECC maintenance technician, the IECC System<br />

Monitor (ISM), is also no longer available. This has<br />

been replaced by a PC-based system, which<br />

provides an improved Windows-based interface with<br />

some additional facilities.<br />

AUTOMATIC ROUTE SETTING<br />

The sophistication of the automatic route-setting<br />

function (ARS) of IECC is the feature which sets it<br />

apart from similar signalling control systems in the<br />

UK and overseas. Whilst automatic setting of routes<br />

for trains running in normal timetable order is<br />

commonplace, IECC uses train regulation algorithms<br />

to maintain a full automatic route setting capability<br />

during periods of service disruption, and the<br />

signaller only needs to intervene in exceptional<br />

circumstances. This contrasts with the approach<br />

seen elsewhere, such as the network management<br />

centres in Germany, where the automated system<br />

provides warning of conflicts, but the decision to<br />

change the timetabled order of trains is taken by the<br />

human not the computer.<br />

The IECC approach to automatic route setting was<br />

based on fundamental research into route setting<br />

algorithms undertaken by British Rail Research. The<br />

ideas were validated first using a system which<br />

simply provided advice to the signaller (a system<br />

called JOT at Glasgow Central in the late 1970s),<br />

and then by a full trial of ARS which took place from<br />

1983 onwards at Three Bridges signalling control<br />

centre, controlling the Haywards Heath area of the<br />

London-Brighton line. The fully developed version of<br />

ARS was active from the first day of IECC commissioning<br />

at Liverpool Street in 1989, and immediately<br />

demonstrated its versatility in handling traffic into<br />

and out of this 18-platform terminus, despite major<br />

disruptions to service caused by initial unreliability of<br />

some of the SSI trackside equipment in a very<br />

severe EMC environment.<br />

The objectives of ARS were to reduce manning<br />

requirements in signalling control centres, and to<br />

improve punctuality by guaranteeing prompt route

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!