06.03.2014 Views

Proceedings 2002/2003 - IRSE

Proceedings 2002/2003 - IRSE

Proceedings 2002/2003 - IRSE

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

CTRL SIGNALLING AND COMMUNICATIONS 83<br />

regular testing of the signalling once commissioned.<br />

He also noted that, as the line was not built to<br />

conventional UK loading gauge, whether non-<br />

Eurostar (passenger) trains would use the line and<br />

asked what the axle weight limit for freight trains<br />

was. Finally he questioned if the access charges<br />

might deter some train operating companies from<br />

using the line.<br />

R Stokes responded that utilisation of a test train<br />

for routine cyclical testing was planned and that the<br />

line was designed for a freight axle loading of 22 1 /2<br />

tonnes at 140 km/h. He also stated that Union<br />

Railways would allow access to any train operator<br />

provided their rolling stock was compatible with the<br />

traction supply and signalling arrangements. He<br />

believed that the limiting factor would actually be the<br />

strict conditions applied for rolling stock passing<br />

through the Channel Tunnel.<br />

G Moens additionally advised that mis-routing<br />

arrangements were to be applied at Singlewell to<br />

prevent out of gauge trains from being directed<br />

towards Fawkham Junction.<br />

J Lester (Eurostar) commented that use of KVB is<br />

very restrictive, slowing down operations on the<br />

railway and wondered if this factor had been<br />

considered in the design.<br />

G Moens stated that there was a balance between<br />

safety and performance and any ATP systems will<br />

affect performance.<br />

P Bassett (AEA Technology) observed that<br />

numerous signals and their corresponding KVB<br />

loops were being installed at St Pancras in the name<br />

of headway improvements. He wondered if this<br />

would not perpetuate the philosophy of running on<br />

“double yellows”, but with new technology, and<br />

questioned if too much was trying to be squeezed<br />

into too short a section of railway.<br />

R Stokes responded by stating that a great deal of<br />

work had been done to rationalise the signalling at<br />

St Pancras but it was not an ideal layout. The design<br />

had not yet been finalised but a minimum of ETCS<br />

Level 1 had to be installed. He also advised that<br />

there would not be as many signals as exists at<br />

Glasgow Central!<br />

C Porter (<strong>IRSE</strong> Vice-President) thanked M. G<br />

Moens and Mr R Stokes for their paper and<br />

expressed the view that it would be good to finally<br />

see in-cab signalling in use in the UK.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!