10.03.2014 Views

size: 5036KB - Crocodile Specialist Group

size: 5036KB - Crocodile Specialist Group

size: 5036KB - Crocodile Specialist Group

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

ttz<br />

Lake Cahora Bassa has a shoreline ofapproximately 1200 km'zand a surface area of 2665 km'?<br />

when at the planned operating level of 326 m a.s.l. @ernacsek and topes, 1984). Since 1981<br />

the mean operating level has dropped to 315 m a.s.l. and this has led to an unstable situation<br />

at the head of the lake close the Zimbabwean border (the Zumbo basin) with a fluctuating<br />

lakehiver interface. Most samDles were collected in this basin.<br />

trlgure 1: The Zambezi River rhowing Lsk€s Kaiiba and Cahora Bassa<br />

NIMBERS AND POPI]LATION STRUCTURE<br />

The age structure and <strong>size</strong> of two populations was estimated for $e Zambezi river, the second<br />

study site being located 300 km downstream fi:om Lake Kariba in Mozambique using methods<br />

summarised in Bayliss (1988) and Graham (1988). The investigation<br />

the Mozambican study<br />

site was an opportunistic one with its principal aim to obtain a sample of larger orocodiles as<br />

these were proving difficult to catch in Lake Kariba. Extensive work went into estimating the<br />

<strong>size</strong> of the Mozambican population using several methods (aerial survey, spotlight munts,<br />

cropping and nest counts) were available and was possible to ascertain if they gave similar<br />

results. Population estimates from nesting data did agree with other methods and consequently<br />

this puts confidence in the population estimates flom nest counts fo. Lake Kariba. The mean<br />

populatio[ estimate for the Zimbabwean side of Lake Kariba was 6 500 crocodiles of all <strong>size</strong>s<br />

with approximately 3 500 of these being larger than 1.2 m total lengtl (i.e. sub-adults and<br />

adults). This gives an estimate density of 3.51 animals per kilometre of shoreline. The<br />

maximum estimate using correction factom from Hutton and Woolholse (1990) was<br />

approximately l1 500 animals with nearly 6 000 ofthese being sub-adults and adults. However,<br />

it should be remembered that in recent years aftempts are being made to collert all eggs fiom

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!