Presidential Greeting - American Society for Laser Medicine and ...
Presidential Greeting - American Society for Laser Medicine and ...
Presidential Greeting - American Society for Laser Medicine and ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
48 <strong>American</strong> <strong>Society</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Laser</strong> <strong>Medicine</strong> <strong>and</strong> Surgery Abstracts<br />
#161<br />
that present at our <strong>Laser</strong> Rehabilitation Clinics on a daily basis.<br />
The various categories of cervical spine pathologies, are reviewed<br />
on the basis of age, gender distribution, number of treatments <strong>and</strong><br />
overall improvement percentages.<br />
Results: Of the 101 patients included in this study, 49%<br />
presented with degenerative osteoarthritis, 22% with repetitive<br />
stress injuries, 18% with sports injuries <strong>and</strong> 12% with trauma. On<br />
average 10 treatments of 30–45 minutes in duration were<br />
administered <strong>for</strong> the individual patient, resulting in a significant<br />
improvement rate averaging 94.5%.<br />
Conclusion: <strong>Laser</strong> therapy confers benefit at both the cellular<br />
<strong>and</strong> systemic levels, activating a variety of mechanisms<br />
including DNA synthesis, improved microcirculation <strong>and</strong> both an<br />
analgesic <strong>and</strong> anti-inflammatory effect. With a combination of<br />
red <strong>and</strong> infrared LED’s <strong>and</strong> laser diodes as a light source<br />
treatment was effective <strong>for</strong> an extensive variety of cervical spine<br />
problems.<br />
#160<br />
INNOVATIVE METHOD TO IMPROVE EFFICACY<br />
AND TOLERABILITY OF PDT TREATMENTS<br />
Carl Thornfeldt, CT Derm<br />
Fruitl<strong>and</strong>, ID<br />
Background: To produce a photodynamic therapy (PDT)<br />
regimen with improved efficacy <strong>and</strong> patient tolerability while<br />
allowing faster administration time. This regimen consists of:<br />
(1) Microdermabrasion.<br />
(2) Infrared LED at 830 nm <strong>for</strong> 20 minutes to inhibit neurogenic<br />
inflammation <strong>and</strong> stimulate deep dermal collagen, elastin <strong>and</strong><br />
glycosaminoglycan synthesis.<br />
(3) 540 nm green light laser.<br />
(4) 570 nm yellow light laser.<br />
(5) 628 nm red LED <strong>for</strong> 20 minutes.<br />
Study: Ten Caucasian panelists participated in an open label<br />
unblinded clinical trial comparing results to baseline with two<br />
PDT treatments each 4–8 weeks apart. Efficacy was graded four<br />
weeks after second treatment. Post-op care required applying a<br />
gel mask containing meadowfoam extract to provide DHA <strong>and</strong><br />
fatty acids <strong>for</strong> acetylcholine synthesis <strong>and</strong> anti-inflammatory<br />
effect. Home care consisted of applying a barrier repairing cream<br />
that is twice as effective as 100% petrolatum in repairing barrier<br />
function every 2–4 hours while awake <strong>for</strong> the next 4 days. All<br />
panelists stayed indoors <strong>for</strong> 24 hours after the treatment.<br />
Tolerability was subjectively assessed by panelists retrospectively<br />
comparing pain, tenderness, itching <strong>and</strong> soreness to previous<br />
chemical peels <strong>and</strong> red <strong>and</strong>/or blue light LED-activated PDT<br />
treatments. Fine lines, shallow wrinkles, sallowness <strong>and</strong><br />
roughness were measured on a 5-point scale by a board certified<br />
dermatologist 4 weeks after the second treatment. Panelists<br />
rated visible improvements <strong>and</strong> treatment symptoms on a 4-point<br />
scale.<br />
Results: All 10 panelists experienced at least a 1 point<br />
improvement (20%) in all parameters. Six patients experienced 3<br />
point improvement (60%) in all parameters. Subjectively all<br />
patients reported good to marked (50–75%) improvement. All<br />
patients stated the test regimen was markedly (75%) more<br />
tolerable.<br />
Conclusion: This unique regimen utilizes longer wavelength<br />
light to maximally activate the smaller aminolevulinic acid peaks,<br />
but not blue light peaks, yet is more effective <strong>and</strong> better tolerated<br />
due to deeper penetration.<br />
A PROSPECTIVE SPLIT-FACE DOUBLE-BLIND<br />
RANDOMIZED PLACEBO-CONTROLLED TRIAL<br />
TO ASSESS THE EFFICACY OF LIGHT-EMITTING<br />
DIODE POSTFRACTIONAL ABLATIVE LASER FOR<br />
SKIN REJUVENATION<br />
Valeria Campos, Juliana Jordao, Tatiana Cordero<br />
Clinica Valeria Campos, Jundiai, Brazil; Clinica Valeria Campos,<br />
Curitiba, Brazil; Clinica Valeria Campos, Campinas, Brazil<br />
Background: Light-emitting diodes (LEDs) are considered to be<br />
effective to stimulate fibroblast activity <strong>and</strong> hasten wound<br />
healing. We investigated the clinical efficacy of LED phototherapy<br />
on wound healing <strong>and</strong> <strong>for</strong> improvement of discom<strong>for</strong>t<br />
postfractional ablative laser.<br />
Objective: To determine whether LED treatment immediately<br />
after fractional laser skin resurfacing affects the severity <strong>and</strong><br />
duration of postoperative pain, erythema <strong>and</strong> wound healing.<br />
Study: Twenty patients received treatment with a LED array<br />
(Multiwaves, Industra, Brazil) to r<strong>and</strong>omly selected facial halves<br />
immediately after full-face fractional laser skin resurfacing with<br />
2,940 nm erbium laser (Etherea, Industra, Brazil) <strong>and</strong> 1 week<br />
after the laser treatment. The LED treatments were daily<br />
alternating wavelengths of 635 nm (red) with 940 nm (infrared)<br />
with fluences of 19.78 J/cm 2 or 11 mW/cm 2 <strong>and</strong> 9 J/cm 2 or 5 mW/<br />
cm 2 respectively, 20 minutes of light exposure. All laser<br />
procedures were per<strong>for</strong>med by a single operator. Clinical<br />
improvement was evaluated by participants <strong>and</strong> two blinded<br />
physicians by observing the comparative photographs. The rate of<br />
re-epithelialization, duration of pain, erythema, <strong>and</strong> presence of<br />
complications were recorded immediately after the procedure <strong>and</strong><br />
1 hour, 24 hour, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 30 days post-treatment.<br />
Results: The LED-treated facial halves were less painful in half<br />
of the patients after the first LED session. The average time to reepithelialization<br />
was 3 days in the LED-treated facial halves <strong>and</strong> 4<br />
days in the LED untreated facial halves.<br />
Conclusion: We believe that the LED after fractional ablative<br />
laser skin resurfacing will greatly enhance the natural wound<br />
healing process, <strong>and</strong> more quickly return the patient to a<br />
pretreatment level of activity.<br />
#162<br />
SAFETY AND EFFICACY OF FOOTLASER<br />
TREATMENT OF ONYCHOMYCOSIS IN PRIVATE<br />
PRACTICE<br />
Michael Uro, Laura Uro, Michael Abrahams,<br />
Martine Abrahams, Robert Grzywacz<br />
Foot Doctor <strong>Laser</strong> Center, Sacramento, CA;<br />
The London Nail <strong>Laser</strong> Clinic, London, Engl<strong>and</strong>; Las Vagas, NV<br />
Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate in a private<br />
practice the effectiveness of a single treatment with the PinPointe<br />
Foot<strong>Laser</strong> <strong>for</strong> onychomycosis.<br />
Study: One hundred <strong>and</strong> ninety-seven patients (321 great toes)<br />
from three private practices with clinical evidence of fungal nails<br />
received a single treatment of either one-pass or two-passes of the<br />
laser energy over all ten toe nails. Pre-treatment <strong>and</strong> follow-up<br />
post-treatment photographs of the hallux were digitized <strong>and</strong><br />
computer-analysed to evaluate safety <strong>and</strong> determine efficacy <strong>and</strong><br />
the change in percent clear nail out to 12 months.<br />
Results: The 2-pass treatment showed a greater treatment effect<br />
than the 1-pass treatment (11.2% vs. 4.4% increase in clear nail at<br />
6-months, respectively). Efficacy, percent of patients who showed