30.10.2012 Views

Presidential Greeting - American Society for Laser Medicine and ...

Presidential Greeting - American Society for Laser Medicine and ...

Presidential Greeting - American Society for Laser Medicine and ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

manufacturer; 4–11.8 J/cm 2 measured). Other difficulties <strong>for</strong><br />

application were found as limited battery duration, slowness or<br />

difficulty <strong>for</strong> auto-application.<br />

Conclusion: In conclusion, these home devices <strong>for</strong> hair removal<br />

tested, shown different parameters from declared by<br />

manufacturer.<br />

#208<br />

REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE: LOW LEVEL<br />

LASER THERAPY IN THE TREATMENT OF<br />

TEMPOROMANDIBULAR DISORDERS<br />

Hadi Daia, Heidi C. Crow, Thomas S. Mang<br />

Buffalo, NY<br />

Background: Low level laser therapy (LLLT) has been used <strong>for</strong><br />

over two decades in the treatment of temporom<strong>and</strong>ibular<br />

disorders (TMD). This review of the literature evaluates the<br />

current evidence <strong>for</strong> the use of LLLT as a treatment modality in<br />

treating patients with TMD.<br />

Study: The literature was searched <strong>for</strong> published clinical<br />

trials or retrospective studies including participants with<br />

one or more TMD diagnoses, <strong>and</strong> using LLLT in the treatment.<br />

Twenty studies were identified, 2 retrospective studies<br />

<strong>and</strong> 17 clinical trials. These studies were evaluated <strong>and</strong><br />

discussed.<br />

Results: All retrospective studies <strong>and</strong> 9 out of the 17 clinical trials<br />

had positive results. Studies with negative results are most likely<br />

due to insufficient dosing or improper design.<br />

Conclusion: LLLT can be considered as an alternative physical<br />

medicine modality in treating patients with TMD. State of the art<br />

dosing is suggested. More studies are needed to define the<br />

ultimate dose specific to each TMD condition.<br />

#209<br />

<strong>American</strong> <strong>Society</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Laser</strong> <strong>Medicine</strong> <strong>and</strong> Surgery Abstracts 61<br />

PORT WINE STAINS PREVIOUSLY TREATED<br />

WITH AN INTENSE PULSED LIGHT SYSTEM.<br />

TREATMENT WITH A DUAL-WAVELENGTH<br />

LASER SYSTEM (595, 1,064 NM) IN 40 PATIENTS<br />

Jesu´s Del Pozo, Esther Cuerda, Lucía Pérez-Varela,<br />

Laura Rosende<br />

CHU A Coruña, A Coruña, Spain; University Rey Juan Carlos,<br />

Madrid, Spain<br />

Background: The elective treatment <strong>for</strong> port wine stain (PWS) is<br />

considered the pulsed dye laser. Other light devices like intense<br />

pulsed light (IPL) systems have shown efficacy in the treatment of<br />

PWS. In our experience only about 25–30% of the PWS treated<br />

with IPL achieved complete clearance. To underst<strong>and</strong> the effect of<br />

the dual PDL-Nd:YAG laser on resistant PWS, 40 patients<br />

previously treated with an IPL system received additional<br />

treatments with the dual laser.<br />

Study: Forty patients 28 females <strong>and</strong> 12 males, average age of<br />

35.5 years (14–72 years) previously treated by an IPL<br />

(Photoderm-Vasculight, Lumenis, Yokneam, Israel) were enrolled<br />

in a study to receive treatment with the <strong>and</strong> dual PDL-Nd:YAG<br />

laser (Cynergy with Multiplex, Cynosure, West<strong>for</strong>d, MA, USA).<br />

The recalcitrant PWS were located: 3 on the leg, 4 on the arm, 7 on<br />

the trunk <strong>and</strong> 26 on the face. In two patients the PWS was<br />

associated with Sturge–Weber syndrome <strong>and</strong> in three patients<br />

with stable hypertrophy. In six patients a CO2 laser was used to<br />

treat the nodules. Four patients received between 1 <strong>and</strong> 5 IPL<br />

treatments, 10 patients received 5–10, 8 patients received 10–15<br />

treatments <strong>and</strong> 18 patients received more than 15 treatments.<br />

Patients were subsequently treated with the dual wavelength<br />

laser using parameters in group IV, a 7 or 10 mm spot size, PDL<br />

fluency between 7 <strong>and</strong> 11 <strong>and</strong> YAG fluency between 40 <strong>and</strong> 60.<br />

Twenty patients received two treatments with the dual laser, 18<br />

patients received three treatments <strong>and</strong> 2 patients received four<br />

treatments.<br />

Results: Improvement with IPL treatments were as follows: two<br />

patients had no change. Fifteen patients improved 0–25%, 11<br />

patients had 25–50% improvement, 11 patients had 50–75%<br />

improvement <strong>and</strong> 1 patients had > 75% improvement. After dual<br />

laser treatments, five patients (four with facial lesions), had no<br />

improvement. Twenty-three patients improved between 25% <strong>and</strong><br />

50%; 10 subjects improved between 50% <strong>and</strong> 75% <strong>and</strong> 1 patient<br />

achieved > 75% improvement. Ten of the 40 subjects indicated<br />

that the dual laser was more painful <strong>and</strong> 20 patients felt<br />

equivalent pain. Eight patients had edema <strong>and</strong> crusting, 5<br />

patients experienced persistent erythema, 2 hypopigmentation, 6<br />

patients had textural changes <strong>and</strong> one hypertrophic scar. The<br />

percentage of secondary effects were a result of delivering high<br />

fluencies on resistant PWS.<br />

Conclusion: 87.5 of patients improved after dual laser<br />

treatment. Of patients who had no response of dual laser<br />

treatment 80% had lesions on the face. In summary, dual<br />

treatment might be an option in treating PWS resistant to IPL<br />

systems.<br />

#210<br />

TREATMENT OF BECKERS NEVUS WITH<br />

MODIFIED INTENSE PULSED LIGHT IN<br />

INDIAN SKIN<br />

Niteen Dhepe, Ashok Naik, Vaishali Phadke,<br />

Shubhangi Sundalam, Nirav Desai<br />

Pune, India<br />

Background: Few reports have been published about the<br />

treatment of Becker’s Nevus using Er:YAG, Qs-Nd:YAG, LP Ruby<br />

<strong>and</strong> intense pulsed light without impressive results. To evaluate<br />

the efficacy <strong>and</strong> safety of modified IPL in the treatment of Becker’s<br />

nevus in Fitzpatrick skin type IV <strong>and</strong> V.<br />

Study: Nine patients (four male, five female), 13–29 years of age,<br />

<strong>and</strong> of skin phototype IV <strong>and</strong> V were treated with modified IPL<br />

(LEO 540 on Harmony plat<strong>for</strong>m, Alma <strong>Laser</strong>s) with 540 nm filter,<br />

fluence energy of 16–20 J/cm 2 , pulse width of 10–12 milliseconds,<br />

at 1–4 months intervals <strong>for</strong> 4–6 sittings. VAS scoring (VAS 1–4)<br />

is done two blinded dermatologists <strong>for</strong> evaluation of pigment<br />

lightening, color matching with surrounding skin <strong>and</strong><br />

complications. All the patients were followed <strong>for</strong> 6–18 (average 7)<br />

months after the last treatment session.<br />

Results: At end of four sessions mean pigment reduction was 2.9<br />

on VAS of four while it was 3.8 at six sessions. Color match with<br />

surrounding skin was observed excellent ( > 75%) in 4/9, good (50–<br />

75%) in 4/9, fair (25–50%) in 1 patient. Clearance was better <strong>and</strong><br />

longer lasting at fluence 19–20 J/cm 2 than 16–18 J/cm 2 <strong>and</strong> better<br />

at 10 milliseconds than 12 <strong>and</strong> 15 milliseconds. Transient<br />

hypopigmentation, erythema <strong>and</strong> hyperpigmentation is observed<br />

<strong>for</strong> a variable period of 4–12 weeks while no scarring is seen in<br />

any patient.<br />

Conclusion: LEO 540 at narrow pulse width <strong>and</strong> high fluence<br />

is safe <strong>and</strong> effective treatment <strong>for</strong> Becker’s Nevus in Indian<br />

skin.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!