Hydraulic Design of Highway Culverts - DOT On-Line Publications
Hydraulic Design of Highway Culverts - DOT On-Line Publications
Hydraulic Design of Highway Culverts - DOT On-Line Publications
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Substituting Hf/L for S and rearranging Equation (35) results in Equation (4b).<br />
The Manning’s n value in Equation (35) is based on either hydraulic test results or resistance<br />
values calculated using a theoretical equation such as the Darcy equation and then converting<br />
to the Manning’s n. As is seen from Equation (34), the Manning’s n varies with the conduit size<br />
(hydraulic radius) to the 1/6 power and has dimensions <strong>of</strong> ft 1/6 . Therefore, for very large or very<br />
small conduits, the Manning’s n should be adjusted for conduit size. Most hydraulic tests for<br />
Manning’s n values have been conducted on moderate size conduits, with pipes in the range <strong>of</strong><br />
2 to 5 ft in diameter or on open channels with hydraulic radii in the range <strong>of</strong> 1 to 4 ft. For large<br />
natural channels, backwater calculations are used to match observed water surface pr<strong>of</strong>iles by<br />
varying the Manning’s n. The resultant Manning’s n accounts for channel size and roughness.<br />
Using a constant value <strong>of</strong> Manning’s n regardless <strong>of</strong> conduit size or flow rate assumes that the<br />
Manning’s n is a function <strong>of</strong> only the absolute size <strong>of</strong> the wall roughness elements and is<br />
independent <strong>of</strong> conduit size and Reynolds number. This assumption is best for rough conduits<br />
where Reynolds number has little influence and the inherent variation with conduit size to the<br />
1/6 power holds true. Thus, the Manning equation has found wide acceptance for use in natural<br />
channels and conduits with rough surfaces. For smooth pipes, other empirical resistance<br />
equations, such as the Hazen-Williams equation, are more <strong>of</strong>ten used.<br />
Extensive tables <strong>of</strong> Manning’s n values are provided in references (23) and (31). For natural<br />
channels, the designer is referred to Table 11 in Appendix D as well as to references 16, 17,<br />
and 18. Manning’s n values for commonly used culvert materials are discussed in the following<br />
sections.<br />
B. Concrete Pipe <strong>Culverts</strong><br />
Concrete pipes are manufactured (pre-cast) using various methods, including centrifugally spun,<br />
dry cast, packerhead, tamp, and wet cast (63). The interior finish (wall roughness) varies with<br />
the method <strong>of</strong> manufacture. For instance, the tamped process generally results in a rougher<br />
interior finish than the wet cast process. The quality <strong>of</strong> the joints and aging (abrasion and<br />
corrosion) also affect the hydraulic resistance <strong>of</strong> concrete pipe. Laboratory tests on tamped<br />
pipe (24 to 36 in., average to good joints) resulted in Manning’s n values <strong>of</strong> about 0.009 (64).<br />
These values are increased to 0.011 to 0.013 based on field installation and aging. Suggested<br />
values <strong>of</strong> Manning’s n for concrete pipes are shown in Table 10.<br />
C. Concrete Box Culvert<br />
The hydraulic resistance <strong>of</strong> concrete box culverts is based on the method <strong>of</strong> manufacture,<br />
installation practices, and aging. Concrete box culverts are either pre-cast or cast-in-place. For<br />
pre-cast boxes, the smoothness <strong>of</strong> the walls, the quality <strong>of</strong> the joints, and aging affect the<br />
Manning’s n values. For cast-in-place boxes, the quality <strong>of</strong> the formwork, construction<br />
practices, and aging are factors. Suggested Manning’s n values range from 0.012 to 0.018 for<br />
concrete box culverts (23).<br />
202