19.05.2014 Views

Chapter 9: Road drainage and the water environment

Chapter 9: Road drainage and the water environment

Chapter 9: Road drainage and the water environment

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

7 PPS25 Sequential <strong>and</strong> Exception Test<br />

In this section, <strong>the</strong> suitability of <strong>the</strong> scheme in relation to <strong>the</strong> requirements of<br />

PPS25 has been considered.<br />

The widening of <strong>the</strong> A14 slip roads <strong>and</strong> proposals for <strong>the</strong> bridleway crossings will<br />

require embankments (approach ramps) which encroach into <strong>the</strong> Flood Zone 3a<br />

as defined by PPS25. The proposed development is classified as essential<br />

transport infrastructure <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>refore is only permitted in Zone 3a if a FRA <strong>and</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> Sequential Test <strong>and</strong> Exception Test are completed.<br />

7.1 The Sequential Test<br />

The Sequential Test should be applied to demonstrate that <strong>the</strong>re are no<br />

alternative sites within <strong>the</strong> area with a lower probability of flooding that could be<br />

used for <strong>the</strong> development. In this case, <strong>the</strong> A14 crosses <strong>the</strong> River Avon <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

existing junction is close to <strong>the</strong> <strong>water</strong>course, it is not possible to relocate <strong>the</strong><br />

development outside of <strong>the</strong> floodplain.<br />

Since <strong>the</strong> development is regarded as Essential Infrastructure <strong>and</strong> falls within<br />

Flood Zone 3a (refer to to Table 3) <strong>the</strong> Exception Test will need to be performed.<br />

7.2 The Exception Test<br />

For <strong>the</strong> Exception Test to be passed:<br />

a) It must be demonstrated that <strong>the</strong> development provides wider sustainability<br />

benefits to <strong>the</strong> community that outweigh flood risk, informed by <strong>the</strong> SFRA where<br />

one has been prepared.<br />

Response:<br />

There are known, high profile, congestion <strong>and</strong> safety problems with <strong>the</strong> M1 /<br />

A14 junction. The improvements to <strong>the</strong> junction will <strong>the</strong>refore reduce <strong>the</strong><br />

stress associated with travelling across Junction 19, increase safety for<br />

vehicle drivers <strong>and</strong> reduce travel times.<br />

b) The development must be on developable previously developed l<strong>and</strong> or, if it is<br />

not on previously developed l<strong>and</strong>, that <strong>the</strong>re are no reasonable alternative sites<br />

on developable previously developed l<strong>and</strong>.<br />

Response:<br />

Due to <strong>the</strong> existing location of Junction 19 <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> River Avon, it is not<br />

possible to locate <strong>the</strong> development elsewhere.<br />

c) A FRA must demonstrate that <strong>the</strong> development will be safe, without increasing<br />

flood risk elsewhere, <strong>and</strong>, where possible, will reduce flood risk overall.<br />

Response:<br />

In this case <strong>the</strong> proposals include floodplain compensation storage for <strong>the</strong><br />

areas of <strong>the</strong> floodplain required for embankments <strong>and</strong> bridge approach<br />

ramps. The existing <strong>drainage</strong> alongside <strong>the</strong> M1 <strong>and</strong> existing carriageway<br />

<strong>drainage</strong> will be maintained <strong>and</strong> improved in accordance with consultation<br />

with <strong>the</strong> EA.<br />

29

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!