Chapter 9: Road drainage and the water environment
Chapter 9: Road drainage and the water environment
Chapter 9: Road drainage and the water environment
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
7 PPS25 Sequential <strong>and</strong> Exception Test<br />
In this section, <strong>the</strong> suitability of <strong>the</strong> scheme in relation to <strong>the</strong> requirements of<br />
PPS25 has been considered.<br />
The widening of <strong>the</strong> A14 slip roads <strong>and</strong> proposals for <strong>the</strong> bridleway crossings will<br />
require embankments (approach ramps) which encroach into <strong>the</strong> Flood Zone 3a<br />
as defined by PPS25. The proposed development is classified as essential<br />
transport infrastructure <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>refore is only permitted in Zone 3a if a FRA <strong>and</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong> Sequential Test <strong>and</strong> Exception Test are completed.<br />
7.1 The Sequential Test<br />
The Sequential Test should be applied to demonstrate that <strong>the</strong>re are no<br />
alternative sites within <strong>the</strong> area with a lower probability of flooding that could be<br />
used for <strong>the</strong> development. In this case, <strong>the</strong> A14 crosses <strong>the</strong> River Avon <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
existing junction is close to <strong>the</strong> <strong>water</strong>course, it is not possible to relocate <strong>the</strong><br />
development outside of <strong>the</strong> floodplain.<br />
Since <strong>the</strong> development is regarded as Essential Infrastructure <strong>and</strong> falls within<br />
Flood Zone 3a (refer to to Table 3) <strong>the</strong> Exception Test will need to be performed.<br />
7.2 The Exception Test<br />
For <strong>the</strong> Exception Test to be passed:<br />
a) It must be demonstrated that <strong>the</strong> development provides wider sustainability<br />
benefits to <strong>the</strong> community that outweigh flood risk, informed by <strong>the</strong> SFRA where<br />
one has been prepared.<br />
Response:<br />
There are known, high profile, congestion <strong>and</strong> safety problems with <strong>the</strong> M1 /<br />
A14 junction. The improvements to <strong>the</strong> junction will <strong>the</strong>refore reduce <strong>the</strong><br />
stress associated with travelling across Junction 19, increase safety for<br />
vehicle drivers <strong>and</strong> reduce travel times.<br />
b) The development must be on developable previously developed l<strong>and</strong> or, if it is<br />
not on previously developed l<strong>and</strong>, that <strong>the</strong>re are no reasonable alternative sites<br />
on developable previously developed l<strong>and</strong>.<br />
Response:<br />
Due to <strong>the</strong> existing location of Junction 19 <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> River Avon, it is not<br />
possible to locate <strong>the</strong> development elsewhere.<br />
c) A FRA must demonstrate that <strong>the</strong> development will be safe, without increasing<br />
flood risk elsewhere, <strong>and</strong>, where possible, will reduce flood risk overall.<br />
Response:<br />
In this case <strong>the</strong> proposals include floodplain compensation storage for <strong>the</strong><br />
areas of <strong>the</strong> floodplain required for embankments <strong>and</strong> bridge approach<br />
ramps. The existing <strong>drainage</strong> alongside <strong>the</strong> M1 <strong>and</strong> existing carriageway<br />
<strong>drainage</strong> will be maintained <strong>and</strong> improved in accordance with consultation<br />
with <strong>the</strong> EA.<br />
29